Hugo Sluimer v. Verity, Inc., et al
Filing
920100520
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HUGO SLUIMER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. VERITY, INC., a corporation; THE VERITY INC. CHANGE IN CONTROL AND SEVERANCE BENEFIT PLAN, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 09-15128 D.C. No. 3:08-cv-01220-SI Northern District of California, San Francisco ORDER
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Susan Illston, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted May 12, 2010--San Francisco, California Filed May 20, 2010 Before: Procter Hug, Jr., Pamela Ann Rymer and M. Margaret McKeown, Circuit Judges.
COUNSEL Gregory L. Doll, Doll Amir & Eley LLP, Los Angeles, California, for the appellants. William Reilly, Rimac Martin, PC, San Francisco, California, for the appellee.
7187
7188
SLUIMER v. VERITY, INC.
ORDER We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its published opinion at 628 F. Supp. 2d 1099 (N.D. Cal. 2008), attached as Appendix A. AFFIRMED.
SLUIMER v. VERITY, INC.
7189
APPENDIX A
7190
SLUIMER v. VERITY, INC.
SLUIMER v. VERITY, INC.
7191
7192
SLUIMER v. VERITY, INC.
SLUIMER v. VERITY, INC.
7193
7194
SLUIMER v. VERITY, INC.
SLUIMER v. VERITY, INC.
7195
7196
SLUIMER v. VERITY, INC.
SLUIMER v. VERITY, INC.
7197
7198
SLUIMER v. VERITY, INC.
SLUIMER v. VERITY, INC.
7199
7200
SLUIMER v. VERITY, INC.
SLUIMER v. VERITY, INC.
7201
7202
SLUIMER v. VERITY, INC.
SLUIMER v. VERITY, INC.
7203
7204
SLUIMER v. VERITY, INC.
SLUIMER v. VERITY, INC.
7205
7206
SLUIMER v. VERITY, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?