Christopher Brekka, et al v. LVRC Holdings LLC, et al
Filing
1
DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND CADS: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: CADS due by Attorney Norman H. Kirshman, Attorney due on 04/24/2009. Transcript order for Appellant Christopher Brekka, Appellant Employee Business Solutions Inc. and Appellant Carolyn Quain due 05/26/2009. Transcript due for Orig Clerk USDC, Las Vegas on 06/23/2009. Certificate of record due 06/30/2009. Appellant Christopher Brekka, Appellant Employee Business Solutions Inc. and Appellant Carolyn Quain opening brief due 08/10/2009. Appellee Brian W. Boschee, Appellee Cavalier Management, LLC, Appellee Centerpoint Interventions, LLC, Appellee Central Recovery Press, LLC, Appellee Central Recovery Treatment LA, LLC, Appellee Central Recovery Treatment, LLC, Appellee Foundation for Recovery, Inc., Appellee Glenbrook Services, LLC, Appellee Thomas G. Grace, Appellee Brad Greenstein, Appellee David Greetham, Appellee Haney, Woloson, & Mullins, Appellee LVRC Holdings LLC, Appellee LVRC Office, LLC, Appellee LVRC Residential, LLC, Appellee NW Living, LLC, Appellee Recovery Management, LLC, Appellee Recovery Properties, LLC, Appellee Santoro, Driggs, Walch, Kearney, Holley &Thompson and Appellee Stuart P. Smith answering brief due 09/08/2009. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. (EB)
A-11 (rev. 7/00)
Page 1 of 2
USCA DOCKET # (IF KNOWN)
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R TH E NINTH CIRCUIT
CIVIL APPEALS DOCKETING STATEMENT
PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES IF NECESSARY.
TITLE IN FULL:
DISTRICT:
JUDGE:
DISTRICT COURT NUM BER:
DATE N OTICE OF AP PEAL
FILE D:
IS THIS A CROSS-APPEAL?
9 YES
IF THIS MATTER HAS BEEN BEFORE THIS COURT PREVIOUSLY,
PLEA SE PR OV IDE TH E D OC KE T N UM BE R AND CIT AT ION (IF ANY ):
B RIE F D ES CR IP TIO N OF NA TU RE OF AC TIO N AN D R ES UL T B EL OW :
PRINCIPAL ISSUES PROPO SED TO BE RAISED ON A PPEAL:
PLEASE IDENTIFY ANY OTHER LEGAL PROCEEDING THAT MAY HAVE A BEARING ON THIS CASE (INCLUDE
PEN DING DISTR ICT C OU RT P OST JUD GM ENT M OT ION S):
DOES THIS APPEAL INVOLVE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
9
9
9
9
Possibility of settlement
Likelihood that intervening precedent will control outcome of appeal
Likelihood of a motion to expedite or to stay the appeal, or other procedural matters (Specify)
Any other information relevant to the inclusion of this case in the Mediation Program
9
Possibility parties would stipulate to binding award by Appellate Commissioner in lieu of submission to judges
LOWER COURT INFORMATION
Page 2 of 2
JURISDICTION
FEDERAL
9
9
FEDERAL
QUESTION
DIVERSITY
9
OTHER
(SPECIFY):
DISTRICT COURT DISPOSITION
APPELLATE
9
9
9
9
TYPE OF JUDGMENT/ORDER APPEALED
FINAL DECISION OF
DISTRICT COURT
INTERLOCUTORY
DECISION APPEALABLE
AS OF RIGHT
INTERLOCUTORY
ORDER CERTIFIED BY
DISTRICT JUDGE
(SPECIFY):
OTHER
(SPECIFY):
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
DEFAULT JUDGMENT
RELIEF
9
SOUGHT $
AWARDED $
DISMISSAL/JURISDICTION
DISMISSAL/MERITS
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JUDGMENT/COURT DECISION
JUDGMENT/JURY VERDICT
DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW
DAMAGES:
9
9
9
9
9
9
OTHER (SPECIFY):
INJUNCTIONS:
PRELIMINARY
PERMANENT
GRANTED
DENIED
ATTORNEY FEES:
SOUGHT $
AWARDED $
9
9
PENDING
COSTS: $
CERTIFICATION OF COUNSEL
I CERTIFY THAT:
1. COPIES OF ORDER/JUDGMENT APPEALED FROM ARE ATTACHED.
2.
A CURRENT SERVICE LIST OR REPRESENTATION STATEMENT WITH TELEPHONE AND FAX NUMBERS IS ATTACHED (SEE 9TH
CIR. RULE 3-2).
3.
A COPY OF THIS CIVIL APPEALS DOCKETING STATEMENT WAS SERVED IN COMPLIANCE WITH FRAP 25.
4.
I UNDERSTAND THAT FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THESE FILING REQUIREMENTS MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS,
INCLUDING DISMISSAL OF THIS APPEAL.
Signature
Date
COUNSEL WHO COMPLETED THIS FORM
NAME:
FIRM:
ADDRESS:
E-MAIL:
TELEPHONE:
FAX:
xTHIS DOCUMENT SHOULD BE FILED IN THE DISTRICT COURT WITH THE NOTICE OF APPEALx
xIF FILED LATE, IT SHOULD BE FILED DIRECTLY WITH THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALSx
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?