Tim Carrico, et al v. City and County of San Franci

Filing 1

DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND CADS: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: CADS due by Attorney James B. Kraus, Attorney due on 09/25/2009. Transcript order for Appellant Mary Figone and Appellant Small Property Owners of San Francisco Institute due 10/26/2009. Transcript due for Orig Clerk USDC, San Francisco on 11/24/2009. Certificate of record due 12/01/2009. Appellant Mary Figone and Appellant Small Property Owners of San Francisco Institute opening brief due 01/11/2010. Appellee City and County of San Francisco answering brief due 02/09/2010. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [7079154] (GR)

Download PDF
A-11 (rev. 7/00) Page 1 of 2 USCA DOCKET # (IF KNOWN) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R TH E NINTH CIRCUIT CIVIL APPEALS DOCKETING STATEMENT PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES IF NECESSARY. TITLE IN FULL: DISTRICT: JUDGE: DISTRICT COURT NUM BER: DATE N OTICE OF AP PEAL FILE D: IS THIS A CROSS-APPEAL? 9 YES IF THIS MATTER HAS BEEN BEFORE THIS COURT PREVIOUSLY, PLEA SE PR OV IDE TH E D OC KE T N UM BE R AND CIT AT ION (IF ANY ): B RIE F D ES CR IP TIO N OF NA TU RE OF AC TIO N AN D R ES UL T B EL OW : PRINCIPAL ISSUES PROPO SED TO BE RAISED ON A PPEAL: PLEASE IDENTIFY ANY OTHER LEGAL PROCEEDING THAT MAY HAVE A BEARING ON THIS CASE (INCLUDE PEN DING DISTR ICT C OU RT P OST JUD GM ENT M OT ION S): DOES THIS APPEAL INVOLVE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING: 9 9 9 9 Possibility of settlement Likelihood that intervening precedent will control outcome of appeal Likelihood of a motion to expedite or to stay the appeal, or other procedural matters (Specify) Any other information relevant to the inclusion of this case in the Mediation Program 9 Possibility parties would stipulate to binding award by Appellate Commissioner in lieu of submission to judges LOWER COURT INFORMATION Page 2 of 2 JURISDICTION FEDERAL 9 9 FEDERAL QUESTION DIVERSITY 9 OTHER (SPECIFY): DISTRICT COURT DISPOSITION APPELLATE 9 9 9 9 TYPE OF JUDGMENT/ORDER APPEALED FINAL DECISION OF DISTRICT COURT INTERLOCUTORY DECISION APPEALABLE AS OF RIGHT INTERLOCUTORY ORDER CERTIFIED BY DISTRICT JUDGE (SPECIFY): OTHER (SPECIFY): 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 DEFAULT JUDGMENT RELIEF 9 SOUGHT $ AWARDED $ DISMISSAL/JURISDICTION DISMISSAL/MERITS SUMMARY JUDGMENT JUDGMENT/COURT DECISION JUDGMENT/JURY VERDICT DECLARATORY JUDGMENT JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW DAMAGES: 9 9 9 9 9 9 OTHER (SPECIFY): INJUNCTIONS: PRELIMINARY PERMANENT GRANTED DENIED ATTORNEY FEES: SOUGHT $ AWARDED $ 9 9 PENDING COSTS: $ CERTIFICATION OF COUNSEL I CERTIFY THAT: 1. COPIES OF ORDER/JUDGMENT APPEALED FROM ARE ATTACHED. 2. A CURRENT SERVICE LIST OR REPRESENTATION STATEMENT WITH TELEPHONE AND FAX NUMBERS IS ATTACHED (SEE 9TH CIR. RULE 3-2). 3. A COPY OF THIS CIVIL APPEALS DOCKETING STATEMENT WAS SERVED IN COMPLIANCE WITH FRAP 25. 4. I UNDERSTAND THAT FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THESE FILING REQUIREMENTS MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS, INCLUDING DISMISSAL OF THIS APPEAL. Signature Date COUNSEL WHO COMPLETED THIS FORM NAME: FIRM: ADDRESS: E-MAIL: TELEPHONE: FAX: xTHIS DOCUMENT SHOULD BE FILED IN THE DISTRICT COURT WITH THE NOTICE OF APPEALx xIF FILED LATE, IT SHOULD BE FILED DIRECTLY WITH THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALSx

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?