Kristin Perry, et al v. Dennis Hollingsworth, et al

Filing 20

Filed (ECF) Errata to response to motion ([19] Response to Motion (ECF Filing) ). Filed by Appellees Paul T. Katami, Kristin M. Perry, Sandra B. Stier and Jeffrey J. Zarrillo. Date of service: 11/23/2009. [7140122]--[COURT UPDATE: Corrected docket text to reflect content of filing. 11/25/2009 by MA] (TO)

Kristin Perry, et al v. Dennis Hollingsworth, et al

Doc. 20

Nos. 09-17241 & 09-17551 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT _________________________ KRISTIN M. PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants, and PROPOSITION 8 OFFICIAL PROPONENTS DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH, et al., Defendant-Intervenors-Appellants. _________________________ On Appeal From The United States District Court For The Northern District Of California No. CV-09-02292 VRW Honorable Vaughn R. Walker ____________________________________________________ NOTICE OF ERRATA IN THE TABLE OF AUTHORITIES FOR APPELLEES' OPPOSITION TO APPELLANTS' EMERGENCY MOTION FOR STAY ____________________________________________________ THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR. REBECCA JUSTICE LAZARUS ENRIQUE A. MONAGAS GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071 [phone] THEODORE B. OLSON MATTHEW D. MCGILL AMIR C. TAYRANI GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 [phone]

Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Appellees Kristin M. Perry, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami, and Jeffrey J. Zarrillo

Dockets.Justia.com

TO THE COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Appellees hereby submit the following Notice of Errata to their Opposition to Appellants' Emergency Motion For Stay, filed November 23, 2009: 1. The Table of Authorities contained in Appellee's Opposition to

Appellants' Emergency Motion for Stay was inadvertently miscompiled. Appellees apologize for the error. At the Court's discretion, the former Table of Authorities to Appellees' Opposition to Appellants' Emergency Motion For Stay may be replaced by the corrected Table of Authorities, attached hereto as Appendix A. DATED: November 23, 2009 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP By /s/ Theodore B. Olson GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP Theodore B. Olson Matthew D. McGill Amir C. Tayrani 1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Appellees KRISTIN M. PERRY, SANDRA B. STIER, PAUL T. KATAMI, and JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO

Appendix A

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Page(s)

Adolph Coors Co. v. Wallace, 570 F. Supp. 202 (N.D. Cal. 1983).........................15 Amoco Production Co. v. Gambell, 480 U.S. 531 (1987) ....................................... 35 Baker v. Adams County/Ohio Valley School Bd., 310 F.3d 927 (6th Cir. 2002) ................................................................................................................... 24 Black Panther Party v. Smith, 661 F.2d 1243 (D.C. Cir. 1981) .............................. 26 City of Los Angeles v. County of Kern, 462 F. Supp. 2d 1105 (C.D. Cal. 2006) ................................................................................................................... 31 Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949)...........................13, 20 Cumberland Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Louisiana Public Service Commission, 260 U.S. 212 (1922)......................................................................................22, 23 Digital Equip. Corp. v. Desktop Direct, Inc., 511 U.S. 863 (1994) ........................ 13 Dole v. Service Employees Union, AFL-CIO, 950 F.2d 1456 (9th Cir. 1991) ........................................................................................................... passim In re Marriage Cases, 183 P.3d 384 (Cal. 2008) ...................................................... 6 In re Napster, Inc. Copyright Litig., 479 F.3d 1078 (9th Cir. 2007).......................19 Las Vegas v. Foley, 747 F.2d 1294 (9th Cir. 1984).................................................32 McLaughlin v. Service Employees Union, AFL-CIO, Local 280, 880 F.2d 170 (9th Cir. 1989)..............................................................................................27 Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United States, 489 U.S. 794 (1989) ................................. 3 Mohawk Indus., Inc. v. Carpenter, No. 08-678 (argued Oct. 5, 2009)....................20 NAACP v. Alabama, 357 U.S. 449 (1958).........................................................28, 29 Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965 (9th Cir. 2009)......................................................26 S.D. Farm Bureau, Inc. v. Hazeltine, 340 F.3d 583 (8th Cir. 2003) .................31, 32 ii

S.E.C. v. Dunlap, 253 F.3d 768 (4th Cir. 2001) ...................................................... 25 SASSO v. Union City, 424 F.2d 291 (9th Cir. 1970) ............................................... 31 Sell v. United States, 539 U.S. 166 (2003) ..................................................13, 14, 18 Truckstop.net, LLC v. Sprint Corp., 547 F.3d 1065 (9th Cir. 2008) .................13, 14 United States v. Fernandez, 231 F.3d 1240 (9th Cir. 2000)....................................13 United States v. Philip Morris Inc., 314 F.3d 612 (D.C. Cir. 2003) ....................... 34 Van Cauwenberghe v. Biard, 486 U.S. 517 (1988) .......................................4, 14, 16 Washington v. Davis, 426 U.S. 229 (1976) ............................................................. 31 Washington v. Seattle Sch. Dist. No. 1, 458 U.S. 457 (1982) ..............................18, 31 Will v. Hallock, 546 U.S. 345 (2006).......................................................................20 Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, 129 S. Ct. 365 (2008) .............................25, 35 Statutes N.D. Cal. L. R. 7-1(a) .............................................................................................. 22 N.D. Cal. L. R. 7-2(b) .............................................................................................. 22 Rules Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(1)............................................................................................33 Fed. R. Evid. 801(d).................................................................................................33 Other Authorities 16A Wright, Miller, et al., Federal Practice and Procedure § 3954 (3d ed.).......................................................................................................................23 Am. Ass'n of Political Consultants Proposition 8 Case Study, 2009 Pollie Awards and Conference (Mar. 28. 2009), at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngbAPVVPD5k ........................................... 17

iii

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE When All Case Participants are Registered for the Appellate CM/ECF System
I hereby certify that on (date) , I electronically filed the foregoing

with the Clerk of the Court for the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit by using the appellate CM/ECF system. I certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and that service will be accomplished by the appellate CM/ECF system. Signature ***********************************************************************

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE When Not All Case Participants are Registered for the Appellate CM/ECF System
I hereby certify that on (date) Nov 23, 2009 , I electronically filed the foregoing

with the Clerk of the Court for the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit by using the appellate CM/ECF system. Participants in the case who are registered CM/ECF users will be served by the appellate CM/ECF system. I further certify that some of the participants in the case are not registered CM/ECF users. I have mailed the foregoing document by First-Class Mail, postage prepaid, or have dispatched it to a third party commercial carrier for delivery within 3 calendar days to the following non-CM/ECF participants: Please see attached service list attachment.

Signature /s/Theodore B. Olson

SERVICE LIST Case Name: Perry, et al. v. Campaign for California Families, et al. Case No: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, Case No. 09-17241 (Consolidated with Case No. 09-17551 as of 11/19/09) Andrew P. Pugno THE LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW P. PUGNO 101 Parkshore Dr. Folsom, CA 95630 Nicole Moss COOPER & KIRK, PLLC 1523 New Hampshire Ave., N.W. Washington, DC 20036 Alan L. Schlosser ACLU FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC. 39 Drumm St. San Francisco, CA 94111 Matthew A. Coles ACLU LGBT & AIDS Project 125 Broad St. New York, NY 10004 Theodore H. Uno BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER 333 Main St. Armonk, NY 10504 Peter A. Patterson COOPER & KIRK, PLLC 1523 New Hampshire Ave., N.W. Washington, DC 20036 Howard C. Neilson, Jr. COOPER & KIRK, PLLC 1523 New Hampshire Ave., N.W. Washington, DC 20036 Jon W. Davidson LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND, INC. Ste. 1300 3325 Wilshire Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90010-1729