Kristin Perry, et al v. Dennis Hollingsworth, et al
Filing
920091230
Opinion
Case: 09-17241
12/30/2009
Page: 1 of 3
DktEntry: 7179397
FILED
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DEC 30 2009
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
KRISTIN M. PERRY; SANDRA B. STIER; PAUL T. KATAMI; JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO, Plaintiffs - Appellees,
No. 09-17241 D.C. No. 3:09-cv-02292-VRW
ORDER and CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Plaintiff-intervenor, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California; EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of California; MARK B. HORTON in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health & State Registrar of Vital Statistics; LINETTE SCOTT, in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Health Information & Strategic Planning for the California Department of Public Health; PATRICK O'CONNELL, in his official capacity as Clerk-Recorder for the County of Alameda; DEAN C. LOGAN, in his official capacity as Registrar-
Case: 09-17241
12/30/2009
Page: 2 of 3
DktEntry: 7179397
Page 2 Recorder/County Clerk for the County of Los Angeles, Defendants, and DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH; GAIL J. KNIGHT; MARTIN F. GUTIERREZ; HAK-SHING WILLIAM TAM; MARK A. JANSSON; PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM - YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF CALIFORNIA RENEWAL, Defendant-intervenors Appellants.
KRISTIN M. PERRY; SANDRA B. STIER; PAUL T. KATAMI; JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO, Plaintiffs - Appellees, and OUR FAMILY COALITION; LAVENDER SENIORS OF THE EAST BAY; PARENTS, FAMILIES, AND FRIENDS OF LESBIANS AND GAYS, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Plaintiff-intervenors -
No. 09-17551 D.C. No. 3:09-cv-02292-VRW
Case: 09-17241
12/30/2009
Page: 3 of 3
DktEntry: 7179397
Page 3 Appellees, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER; EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr.; MARK B. HORTON; LINETTE SCOTT; PATRICK O'CONNELL; DEAN C. LOGAN, Defendants, and DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH; GAIL J. KNIGHT; MARTIN F. GUTIERREZ; HAK-SHING WILLIAM TAM; MARK A. JANSSON; PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM - YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF CALIFORNIA RENEWAL, Defendant-intervenors Appellants.
Before:
THOMAS, Circuit Judge and En Banc Coordinator.
A judge of this court called for this case to be reheard en banc. A vote was taken, and a majority of the nonrecused active judges of the court did not vote in favor of en banc consideration. The call for rehearing en banc is DENIED. The case is returned to the three-judge panel.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?