American Civil Liberties Union, et al v. John Kroger, et al

Filing 58

Filed (ECF) Appellants American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon, Cascade AIDS Project, Candace Morgan and Planned Parenthood of the Columbia/Willamette, Inc. bill of costs (Form 10) in the amount of 239 USD. Date of service: 09/29/2010 [7490981] (Runkles-Pearson, Patricia) [Entered: 09/29/2010 11:23 AM]

Download PDF
American Civil Liberties Union, et al v. John Kroger, et al Doc. 58 Case: 09-35153 09/20/2010 Page: 4 of 5 ID: 7479136 DktEntry: 61-2 Form 10. Bill of Costs ................................................................................................................................ (Rev. 12-1-09) United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit BILL OF COSTS Note: If you wish to file a bil of costs, it MUST be submitted on this form and fied, with the clerk, with proof of service, within 14 days of the date of entr of judgment, and in accordance with 9th Circuit Rule 39-1. A late bil of costs must be accompanied by a motion showing good cause. Please refer to FRA 39, 28 U .S.C. 1920, and 9th Circuit Rule 39-1 when preparing your bil of costs. 1~~~~~~~~~~~il~i?~~ie_~~~i~_~~_~!~~:___J v. I~~~~~,_~~~!_~_______________________...._I 9th Cir. No.109-351?4 The Clerk is requested to tax the following costs against: I~~r~~~~~~_~=~~!?~!~~_~~_____________________ I .................J Cost Taxable underFRAP 39, 28 U.S.C. 1920, 9th Cir. R. 39-1 No. REQUESTED Each Column Must Be Completed ALLOWED To Be Completed by the Clerk of Docs. Pages per Doc. I Cost per Page* $ TOTAL COST No. of Docs. Pages per Doc. $ $ $ Cost per Excerpt of Record 15 __"nO"____I 134~___ __ .1 t~:I______1 $ I~7~__ I i.__ _...._.. --- I 1______________.1 Opening Brief Answering Brief Reply Brief h~___..._1 I_~~___J $ 1________-1______------ I 10.1______J $ $ $ CJ 1?:1.............._.1 155 i L____J --,-_...-..__...-----..-_._~._-"--_...,.__. 1____________1 C D Page* TOTAL COST $ $ $ i ._._......... '-_________J I '-_______.1 i I I I '------______1 i I I i i : , , t~? _I ti~..... ........ $ Other** I I I $ D $ 112 ........_---) , $ $ $ I ... I i i , L $ rC D I I $ I $ I TOTAL: I~~~... _...... TOTAL: $ I * Costs per page may not exceed .10 or actual cost, whichever is less. 9th Circuit Rule 39-1. ** Other: Any other requests must be accompanied by a statement explaining why the item(s) should be taxed pursuant to 9th Circuit Rule 39-1. Additional items without such supporting statements wil not be considered. Attorneys' fees cannot be requested on this form. Continue to next page. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 09-35153 09/20/2010 Page: 5 of 5 10: 7479136 OktEntry: 61-2 Form 10. Bil of Costs - Continued I, I~~~:_~~~~!e._~=~e.~~~?~ ....... __ _____________.1 ' swear under penalty of perjury that the services for which costs are taxed were actually and necessarily performed, and that the requested costs were actually expended as listed. Signature 1~!~:I\:It~~~!~~=~e~~~~_~__ .... _.. ..._ ._, ("s/" plus attorney's name if submitted electronically) Date.~_~~!~~?~~~~,~~~~_1 Name of I' Counsel: 1~.I\:_~~~~le~=~~~~~~~_ .._.__ Attorney for: ipiainti~~AP:I1=ts~c~u,~ai____ (To Be Completed by the Clerk) Date I Costs are taxed in the amount of $ '-__ Clerk of Court By: I. , Deputy Clerk CERTIFICATE OF FILING AN SERVICE United States Court of Appeals Docket Number: No. 09-35154 I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing BILL OF COSTS with the Clerk of the Court for the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit by using the appellate CMCF system on September 29,2010. I certify that all participants in the case are registered CMCF users and that service will be accomplished by the appellate CMCF system. Dated: September 29,2010 STOEL RIVES LLP s/ P. K. Runkles-Pearson P. K. Runkes-Pearson, OSB No. 061911 Attorney for Plaintif-Appellants ACLU of Oregon, et al. in 09-35154 Portlnd3-1666303.l 0099880-00578

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?