Matthew Young v. Intel Corporation, et al

Filing 4

Order filed (J. CLIFFORD WALLACE, EDWARD LEAVY and CARLOS T. BEA) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. (SC)

Download PDF
FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MATTHEW ROBERT YOUNG, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. APR 28 2009 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS No. 09-35164 D.C. No. 3:08-CV-01496-BR District of Oregon, Portland INTEL CORPORATION; et al., ORDER Defendants - Appellees. Before: WALLACE, LEAVY and BEA, Circuit Judges. A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997 ) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. MF/Pro Se

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?