Matthew Young v. Intel Corporation, et al

Filing 7

Order filed (ALFRED T. GOODWIN, PAMELA ANN RYMER and JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON) A review of the record, the opening brief and the response to the September 17, 2009 order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment. AFFIRMED. . [7161817] (KKW)

FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MATTHEW ROBERT YOUNG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.

DEC 11 2009
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

No. 09-35790
D.C. No. 3:08-cv-01496-BR
District of Oregon,
Portland

INTEL CORPORATION; et al.,
ORDER
Defendants - Appellees.

Before: GOODWIN, RYMER and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
A review of the record, the opening brief and the response to the September
17, 2009 order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are
so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton,
693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.
AFFIRMED.

SVG/Pro Se