USA v. Michael Carona


FILED OPINION (JOHN T. NOONAN, RICHARD R. CLIFTON and JAY S. BYBEE) It does not appear to us that there was a violation of Rule 2-100 by the prosecutors in this case, but even if there had been, the district court s decision to deny Carona s motion to suppress and other requested relief was not an abuse of discretion. Carona s conduct violated 18 U.S.C. 1512(b)(2)(A), UNITED STATES v. CARONA 437 and consequently the district court properly denied Carona s motions to arrest judgment and for a judgment of acquittal. AFFIRMED.. Judge: JTN , Judge: RRC Authoring, Judge: JSB . FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [7601860]

Download PDF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?