Kristin Perry, et al v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
Filing
380
Filed (ECF) Appellee City and County of San Francisco reply to response (,motion to consolidate cases). Date of service: 11/18/2011. [7973726] (CV)
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KRISTIN M. PERRY, et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,
Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee,
vs.
No. 10-16696
(argued Dec. 6, 2010);
No. 11-16577
U.S. District Court
Case No. 09-cv-02292 JW
EDMUND G. BROWN JR., et al.,
Defendants,
DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH, et al.
Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants.
PLAINTIFF-INTERVENOR-APPELLEE
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO'S
RESPONSE TO MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California
The Honorable Chief District Judge James Ware
DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669
City Attorney
THERESE M. STEWART, State Bar #104930
Chief Deputy City Attorney
CHRISTINE VAN AKEN, State Bar #241755
MOLLIE M. LEE, State Bar #251404
Deputy City Attorneys
City Hall, Room 234, One Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
San Francisco, California 94102-4682
Telephone: (415) 554-4708
Attorneys for Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
CASE NO. 10-16696
n:\govli1\li2010\100617\00739454.doc
Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants have moved this Court to consolidate
Case Nos. 10-16696 and 11-16577. The City and County of San Francisco concurs
that consolidation is appropriate on the understanding that consolidation will not
delay resolution of Case No. 10-16696.
Dated:
November 21, 2011
Respectfully submitted,
DENNIS J. HERRERA
City Attorney
THERESE M. STEWART,
Chief Deputy City Attorney
CHRISTINE VAN AKEN
MOLLIE M. LEE
Deputy City Attorneys
By:
/ s/ Christine Van Aken
CHRISTINE VAN AKEN
Deputy City Attorney
Attorneys for Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
CASE NO. 10-16696
n:\govli1\li2010\100617\00739454.doc
9th Circuit Case Number(s) 10-16696, 11-16577
NOTE: To secure your input, you should print the filled-in form to PDF (File > Print > PDF Printer/Creator).
*********************************************************************************
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
When All Case Participants are Registered for the Appellate CM/ECF System
I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court for the
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit by using the appellate CM/ECF system
on (date)
.
November 21, 2011
I certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and that service will be
accomplished by the appellate CM/ECF system.
Signature (use "s/" format)
s/ Martina Hassett
*********************************************************************************
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
When Not All Case Participants are Registered for the Appellate CM/ECF System
I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court for the
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit by using the appellate CM/ECF system
on (date)
.
Participants in the case who are registered CM/ECF users will be served by the appellate
CM/ECF system.
I further certify that some of the participants in the case are not registered CM/ECF users. I
have mailed the foregoing document by First-Class Mail, postage prepaid, or have dispatched it
to a third party commercial carrier for delivery within 3 calendar days to the following
non-CM/ECF participants:
Signature (use "s/" format)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?