Conklin Development, et al v. City Of Spokane Valley

Filing 1

DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 05/03/2010. Transcript due 06/01/2010. Appellant Conklin Development and Appellant Robert J. Heitman Jr. opening brief due 07/12/2010. Appellee City Of Spokane Valley answering brief due 08/10/2010. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [7288637] (HC)

Download PDF
Conklin Development, et al v. City Of Spokane Valley Doc. 1 Att. 2 Office of the Clerk United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Post Office Box 193939 San Francisco, California 94119-3939 415-355-8000 Molly C. Dwyer Clerk of Court April 02, 2010 No.: D.C. No.: Short Title: 10-35322 2:09-cv-00070-FVS Conklin Development, et al v. City Of Spokane Valley Dear Appellant/Counsel A copy of your notice of appeal/petition has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number shown above has been assigned to this case. You must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number whenever you communicate with this court regarding this case. Please furnish this docket number immediately to the court reporter if you place an order, or have placed an order, for portions of the trial transcripts. The court reporter will need this docket number when communicating with this court. The due dates for filing the parties' briefs and otherwise perfecting the appeal have been set by the enclosed "Time Schedule Order," pursuant to applicable FRAP rules. These dates can be extended only by court order. Failure of the appellant to comply with the time schedule order will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. 9th Cir. R. 42-1. Enclosed with this letter is an appellate processing schedule along with a case processing checklist to help you monitor the progress of your case. Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FILED APR 02 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS CONKLIN DEVELOPMENT, a Washington general partnership; ROBERT J. HEITMAN, Jr., individually and on behalf of the marital community, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, Defendant - Appellee. No. 10-35322 D.C. No. 2:09-cv-00070-FVS U.S. District Court for Eastern Washington, Spokane TIME SCHEDULE ORDER The parties shall meet the following time schedule. If there were reported hearings, the parties shall designate and, if necessary, crossdesignate the transcripts pursuant to 9th Cir. R. 10-3.1. If there were no reported hearings, the transcript deadlines do not apply. Mon., May 3, 2010 Tue., June 1, 2010 Mon., July 12, 2010 Transcript shall be ordered. Transcript shall be filed by court reporter. Appellant's opening brief and excerpts of record shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir. R. 32-1. Tue., August 10, 2010 Appellee's answering brief and excerpts of record shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir. R. 32-1. The optional appellant's reply brief shall be filed and served within fourteen days of service of the appellee's brief, pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir. R. 32-1. Failure of the appellant to comply with the Time Schedule Order will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. FOR THE COURT: Molly C. Dwyer Clerk of Court Holly Crosby Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?