Perfect 10, Inc. v. Google, Inc.

Filing 65

Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: GSS): Appellee Google, Inc.’s bill of costs is granted in part. Cost shall be taxed against appellant Perfect 10 in the amount of $1,517.60. Appellee Google, Inc.’s request for additional costs for the DVD and hard drive duplication is denied. Appellee Google, Inc. is reminded that Ninth Circuit Rule 30-1.4(x) applies to written exhibits and not to electronic exhibits. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1.4(x) and 9th Cir. R. 39-1.2. A copy of this order shall serve to amend the court’s prior mandate. [7907109] (AF)

Download PDF
FILED SEP 27 2011 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PERFECT 10, INC., MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS No. 10-56316 Plaintiff-counter-defendant Appellant, D.C. No. 2:04-cv-09484-AHM-SH Central District of California, Los Angeles v. GOOGLE, INC., a corporation, ORDER Defendant-counter-claimant Appellee. Appellee Google, Inc.’s bill of costs is granted in part. Cost shall be taxed against appellant Perfect 10 in the amount of $1,517.60. Appellee Google, Inc.’s request for additional costs for the DVD and hard drive duplication is denied. Appellee Google, Inc. is reminded that Ninth Circuit Rule 30-1.4(x) applies to written exhibits and not to electronic exhibits. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1.4(x) and 9th Cir. R. 39-1.2. A copy of this order shall serve to amend the court’s prior mandate. For the Court: MOLLY C. DWYER Clerk of Court Grace S. Santos Deputy Clerk Ninth Circuit Rule 27-7/Advisory Note to Rule 27 and Ninth Circuit 27-10 GS 09/26/11/Pro M o/Pro M o

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?