Angel Lopez-Valenzuela, et al v. County of Maricopa, et al
Filing
Filed En Banc Order for PUBLICATION (ALEX KOZINSKI) Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. Judges Murguia and Hurwitz did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case. [8922097]
Case: 11-16487
01/02/2014
ID: 8922097
DktEntry: 72
Page: 1 of 1
FILED
JAN 02 2014
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANGEL LOPEZ-VALENZUELA;
ISAAC CASTRO-ARMENTA,
No. 11-16487
D.C. No. 2:08-cv-00660-SRB
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
ORDER
v.
COUNTY OF MARICOPA; JOSEPH
M. ARPAIO, Maricopa County Sheriff,
in his official capacity; WILLIAM G.
MONTGOMERY, Maricopa County
Attorney, in his official capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that
this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)
and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as
precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Judges Murguia and Hurwitz did not participate in the deliberations or vote
in this case.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?