Angel Lopez-Valenzuela, et al v. County of Maricopa, et al

Filing

Filed En Banc Order for PUBLICATION (ALEX KOZINSKI) Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. Judges Murguia and Hurwitz did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case. [8922097]

Case: 11-16487

01/02/2014

ID: 8922097

DktEntry: 72

Page: 1 of 1

FILED
JAN 02 2014

FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANGEL LOPEZ-VALENZUELA;
ISAAC CASTRO-ARMENTA,

No. 11-16487
D.C. No. 2:08-cv-00660-SRB

Plaintiffs - Appellants,
ORDER

v.
COUNTY OF MARICOPA; JOSEPH
M. ARPAIO, Maricopa County Sheriff,
in his official capacity; WILLIAM G.
MONTGOMERY, Maricopa County
Attorney, in his official capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that
this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)
and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as
precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Judges Murguia and Hurwitz did not participate in the deliberations or vote
in this case.