Antonio Hinojos v. Kohl's Corporation, et al

Filing

Filed order (STEPHEN R. REINHARDT, KIM MCLANE WARDLAW and RICHARD A. PAEZ) Amending Disposition Opinion REVERSED AND REMANDED;The majority opinion filed May 21, 2013, is hereby amended as follows: 1. Footnote 6, Slip. Op. at 11, is deleted. With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and the suggestion for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc are denied. The petition for rehearing and the suggestion for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No future petitions for rehearing or petitions for rehearing en banc will be entertained. [8693226]

Download PDF
Case: 11-55793 07/08/2013 ID: 8693226 DktEntry: 36 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ANTONIO S. HINOJOS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 11-55793 D.C. No. 2:10-cv-07590ODW-AGR v. KOHL’S CORPORATION , a Wisconsin corporation; KOHL’S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendants-Appellees. ORDER Filed July 8, 2013 Before: Stephen Reinhardt, Kim McLane Wardlaw, and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges. ORDER The majority opinion filed May 21, 2013, is hereby amended as follows: 1. Footnote 6, Slip. Op. at 11, is deleted. Page: 1 of 2 Case: 11-55793 2 07/08/2013 ID: 8693226 DktEntry: 36 HINOJOS V . KOHL’S CORP . With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and the suggestion for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc are denied. The petition for rehearing and the suggestion for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No future petitions for rehearing or petitions for rehearing en banc will be entertained. Page: 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?