Laura Larson v. Warner Bros Entertainment, Inc, et al

Filing 10

Filed (ECF) Appellant Laura Siegel Larson in 11-55863, Appellee Laura Siegel Larson in 11-56034 Unopposed Motion to extend time to file First Brief on Cross-Appeal brief until 12/22/2011. Date of service: 10/26/2011. [7944070] [11-55863, 11-56034] (MT)

Download PDF
APPELLATE CASE NO. 11-55863 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LAURA SIEGEL LARSON Plaintiff, Counterclaim-Defendant, and Appellant. v. WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC., DC COMICS Defendants, Counterclaimants, and Appellees. APPELLANT LAURA SIEGEL LARSON’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPENING BRIEF Appeal From The United States District Court for the Central District of California, Case No. CV-04-8400 ODW (RZx), Hon. Otis D. Wright II TOBEROFF & ASSOCIATES, P.C. Marc Toberoff mtoberoff@ipwla.com Keith G. Adams kgadams@ipwla.com 2049 Century Park East, Suite 3630 Los Angeles, California 90067 Telephone: (310) 246-3333 Facsimile: (310) 246-3101 Attorneys for Plaintiff-Appellant, Laura Siegel Larson, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Joanne Siegel 1 APPELLANT LAURA SIEGEL LARSON’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO FILE HER OPENING BRIEF Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 26(b) and Ninth Cir. Rule 31-2.2(b), PlaintiffAppellant Laura Siegel Larson (“Appellant”) respectfully moves for a 45-day extension of time, from November 7, 2011 to December 22, 2011 to file her opening brief and excerpts of record. Appellant has not previously requested an extension of time as to this appeal, and Defendants-Appellees DC Comics and Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc. (“Appellees”) do not oppose this motion. See Declaration of Marc Toberoff (“Toberoff Decl.”), ¶¶ 1-2, 12. The Court in this case and the cross-appeal Laura Siegel Larson v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc., et al., Case 11-56034, set the following briefing schedule on June 20, 2011 for the appeals: Appellant’s first cross-appeal brief is due on November 7, 2011; Appellees’ second cross-appeal brief is due on December 7, 2011; Appellant’s third cross-appeal brief is due on January 6, 2012; and Appellees’ optional reply cross-appeal brief is due fourteen (14) days after service of the third cross-appeal brief. Good cause exists for the requested extension for several reasons. The issues in this appeal are complex and require time to prepare an opening brief that will most effectively assist the Court in resolving the issues raised. Id., ¶ 3. Additional time is also appropriate because Appellees on June 28, 2011 filed 1 a motion to dismiss, which was fully briefed. Id., ¶ 4. This court denied Appellees’ motion in an order filed September 22, 2011. Id. While under Circuit Rule 27-11, motions to dismiss “shall stay the schedule for record preparation and briefing pending the court’s disposition of the motion,” the Court’s briefing schedule has not been changed. Appellant’s counsel is the principal of a small boutique law firm, comprised of three attorneys, that focuses on copyright litigation. Id., ¶ 6. Appellant’s counsel has competing commitments that further justify the brief extension of time requested herein. Appellant’s counsel represents the plaintiff in the case The First National Bank in Sioux Falls v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc., et al., C.D. Cal. Case No. 09-CV-08887 (GAF), and have a settlement mediation, summary judgment briefing, motions, and numerous depositions due over the next month. Id., ¶ 7. Appellant’s counsel also represents the children and heirs of comic book creator Jack Kirby as appellants in Marvel Characters, Inc., et al. v. Kirby, et al., C.A. No. 11-03333 (CM) (2d Cir.), wherein counsel must prepare and file an opening brief and an appendix by December 9, 2011. Id., ¶ 8. Furthermore, in this case, and the related cases, Siegel, et al. v. Time Warner Inc., et al., C.D. Cal. Case No. 04-CV-08776 (ODW) and DC Comics v. Pacific Pictures Corp., et al., C.D. Cal. Case No. 10-CV-03633 (ODW), the parties have a JAMS settlement mediation scheduled with the Hon. Daniel Weinstein on 2 December 1, 2011. Id., ¶ 5. Finally, Appellees will not be prejudiced. Appellees’ counsel initially brought up the subject of extending the briefing schedule, and has informed Appellant’s counsel that Appellees do not oppose this motion. Id., ¶ 9. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, Appellant’s motion for an extension of the due date for her opening brief and excerpts of record, until December 22, 2011, should be granted. Dated: October 26, 2011 TOBEROFF & ASSOCIATES, P.C. /s/ Marc Toberoff Marc Toberoff Attorneys for Appellant, Laura Siegel Larson 3 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE Pursuant to Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 27(d) and 32(a), I certify that the Appellant Laura Siegel Larson’s brief is proportionately spaced, has a typeface of 14 points or more, and does not exceed 20 pages. Dated: October 26, 2011 TOBEROFF & ASSOCIATES, P.C. By: /s/ Marc Toberoff Marc Toberoff Attorneys for Laura Siegel Larson 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?