Laura Larson v. Warner Bros Entertainment, Inc, et al

Filing 4

DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL ON CROSS APPEAL. SEND MQ: Yes. Setting cross-appeal briefing schedule as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 06/27/2011. First cross appeal brief due 11/07/2011 for Laura Siegel Larson. Second brief on cross appeal due 12/07/2011 for DC Comics and Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc.. Third brief on cross appeal due 01/06/2012 for Laura Siegel Larson. Optional reply brief on cross appeal due 14 days after service of third brief. [7790696] [11-56034, 11-55863] (FB)

Download PDF
Office of the Clerk United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Post Office Box 193939 San Francisco, California 94119-3939 415-355-8000 Molly C. Dwyer Clerk of Court No.: D.C. No.: Short Title: June 20, 2011 11-56034 2:04-cv-08400-ODW-RZ Laura Larson v. Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc., et al Dear Appellants/Counsel A copy of your notice of appeal/petition has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number shown above has been assigned to this case. You must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number whenever you communicate with this court regarding this case. Please furnish this docket number immediately to the court reporter if you place an order, or have placed an order, for portions of the trial transcripts. The court reporter will need this docket number when communicating with this court. The due dates for filing the parties' briefs and otherwise perfecting the appeal have been set by the enclosed "Time Schedule Order," pursuant to applicable FRAP rules. These dates can be extended only by court order. Failure of the appellant to comply with the time schedule order will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. 9th Cir. R. 42-1. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FILED JUN 20 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS LAURA SIEGEL LARSON, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Joanne Siegel, Plaintiff-counter-claim-defendant Appellant, v. No. 11-55863 D.C. No. 2:04-cv-08400-ODW-RZ U.S. District Court for Central California, Los Angeles TIME SCHEDULE ORDER WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT, INC., a corporation; DC COMICS, a New York General Partnership, Defendants-counter-claimants Appellees. LAURA SIEGEL LARSON, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Joanne Siegel, Plaintiff-counter-claim-defendant – Cross/Appellee, v. WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT, INC., a corporation; DC COMICS, Defendants-counter-claimants – Cross/Appellants. No. 11-56034 D.C. No. 2:04-cv-08400-ODW-RZ U.S. District Court for Central California, Los Angeles This order vacates all brief due dates set by previously issued time schedule orders. The parties shall meet the following cross appeal time schedule. Mon., June 27, 2011 Mediation Questionnaire due. If your registration for Appellate ECF is confirmed after this date, the Mediation Questionnaire is due within one day of receiving the email from PACER confirming your registration. Mon., November 7, 2011 The party(s) who filed the first appeal shall file and serve the first brief on cross-appeal pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir. R. 32-1. Wed., December 7, 2011 The party(s) who filed the second appeal shall file and serve the second brief on cross-appeal pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir. R. 32-1. Fri., January 6, 2012 The third brief on cross-appeal shall be filed and served pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir. R. 32-1. The optional cross appeal reply brief shall be filed and served within fourteen days of service of the third brief on cross appeal, pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir. R. 32-1. Failure of the appellants to comply with the Time Schedule Order will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. FOR THE COURT: Molly C. Dwyer Clerk of Court Freddie Brown Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?