Laura Larson v. Warner Bros Entertainment, Inc, et al

Filing 9

Filed order (Appellate Commissioner) Appellees’ motion to dismiss appeal No. 11-55863 for lack of jurisdiction is denied without prejudice to renewing the arguments in the second brief on crossappeal. See Nat’l Indus. v. Republic Nat’l Life Ins. Co., 677 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1982) (stating that merits panel may consider appellate jurisdiction despite earlier denial of motion to dismiss). The briefing schedule established previously shall remain in effect. (MOATT) [7903804] [11-55863, 11-56034] (SM)

Download PDF
FILED SEP 22 2011 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LAURA SIEGEL LARSON, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Joanne Siegel, Plaintiff / CounterclaimDefendant - Appellant / Cross-Appellee, MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS Nos. 11-55863, 11-56034 D.C. No. 2:04-cv-08400-ODW Central District of California, Los Angeles ORDER v. WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT, INC., a corporation; DC COMICS, a New York General Partnership, Defendants / Counterclaimants - Appellees / Cross-Appellants. Before: Peter L. Shaw, Appellate Commissioner. Appellees’ motion to dismiss appeal No. 11-55863 for lack of jurisdiction is denied without prejudice to renewing the arguments in the second brief on crossappeal. See Nat’l Indus. v. Republic Nat’l Life Ins. Co., 677 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1982) (stating that merits panel may consider appellate jurisdiction despite earlier denial of motion to dismiss). The briefing schedule established previously shall remain in effect. RJ/MOATT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?