Ebony Batts, et al v. William Adams, Jr., et al

Filing 1

DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 11/08/2011. Transcript ordered by 11/30/2011. Transcript due 02/28/2012. Appellants Ebony Latrice Batts, Manfred Mohr opening brief due 04/09/2012. Appellees William Adams Jr., Cherry River Music Co., EMI April Music, Inc., Stacy Ferguson, Jaime Gomez, Headphone Junkie Publishing, LLC, Interscope Records, Jeepney Music, Inc., Jaime Munson, Allan Pineda, Tab Magnetic Publishing, UMG Recordings, Inc., Will.I.Am Music, LLC answering brief due 05/09/2012. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [7949652] (JN)

Download PDF
Office of the Clerk United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Post Office Box 193939 San Francisco, California 94119-3939 415-355-8000 Molly C. Dwyer Clerk of Court No.: D.C. No.: Short Title: November 01, 2011 11-56921 2:10-cv-08123-JFW-RZ Ebony Batts, et al v. William Adams, Jr., et al Dear Appellant/Counsel A copy of your notice of appeal/petition has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number shown above has been assigned to this case. You must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number whenever you communicate with this court regarding this case. Please furnish this docket number immediately to the court reporter if you place an order, or have placed an order, for portions of the trial transcripts. The court reporter will need this docket number when communicating with this court. The due dates for filing the parties' briefs and otherwise perfecting the appeal have been set by the enclosed "Time Schedule Order," pursuant to applicable FRAP rules. These dates can be extended only by court order. Failure of the appellant to comply with the time schedule order will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. 9th Cir. R. 42-1. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FILED NOV 01 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS EBONY LATRICE BATTS, an individual, AKA Phoenix Phenom; MANFRED MOHR, an individual, Plaintiffs - Appellants, No. 11-56921 D.C. No. 2:10-cv-08123-JFW-RZ U.S. District Court for Central California, Los Angeles v. TIME SCHEDULE ORDER WILLIAM ADAMS, Jr.; STACY FERGUSON; ALLAN PINEDA; JAIME GOMEZ, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas; JAIME MUNSON, AKA Poet Name Life; UMG RECORDINGS, INC.; INTERSCOPE RECORDS; EMI APRIL MUSIC, INC.; HEADPHONE JUNKIE PUBLISHING, LLC; WILL.I.AM MUSIC, LLC; JEEPNEY MUSIC, INC.; TAB MAGNETIC PUBLISHING; CHERRY RIVER MUSIC CO., Defendants - Appellees. The parties shall meet the following time schedule. If there were reported hearings, the parties shall designate and, if necessary, crossdesignate the transcripts pursuant to 9th Cir. R. 10-3.1. If there were no reported hearings, the transcript deadlines do not apply. Tue., November 8, 2011 Mediation Questionnaire due. If your registration for Appellate ECF is confirmed after this date, the Mediation Questionnaire is due within one day of receiving the email from PACER confirming your registration. Wed., November 30, 2011 Transcript shall be ordered. Tue., February 28, 2012 Transcript shall be filed by court reporter. Mon., April 9, 2012 Appellant's opening brief and excerpts of record shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir. R. 32-1. Wed., May 9, 2012 Appellees' answering brief and excerpts of record shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir. R. 32-1. The optional appellant's reply brief shall be filed and served within fourteen days of service of the appellees' brief, pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir. R. 32-1. Failure of the appellant to comply with the Time Schedule Order will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. FOR THE COURT: Molly C. Dwyer Clerk of Court Jennifer Nidorf Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?