USA v. Margarito Flores-Cordero

Filing

Filed order (MARY M. SCHROEDER, CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN and SARAH S. VANCE) Amending Disposition Opinion VACATED; REMANDED; The Opinion filed July 25, 2013, appearing at 723 F.3d 1085, is amended as follows: 1. At slip op. 4, in the first sentence of the second full paragraph; 723 F.3d at 1086, line 2 of the third full paragraph, insert or risk between the words application and of. 2. At slip op. 8, in the first sentence of the second full paragraph; 723 F.3d at 1088, line 4 of the second full paragraph, delete the word serious. With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. The petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. [8809519]

Download PDF
Case: 12-10220 10/04/2013 ID: 8809519 DktEntry: 35 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 12-10220 D.C. No. 4:11-cr-02432-CKJGEE-1 v. MARGARITO FLORESCORDERO, Defendant-Appellant. ORDER AMENDING OPINION Filed October 4, 2013 Before: Mary M. Schroeder and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges, and Sarah S. Vance, Chief District Judge.* ORDER The Opinion filed July 25, 2013, appearing at 723 F.3d 1085, is amended as follows: 1. At slip op. 4, in the first sentence of the second full paragraph; 723 F.3d at 1086, line 2 of the third full paragraph, insert “or risk” between the words “application” and “of.” * The Honorable Sarah S. Vance, Chief United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Louisiana, sitting by designation. Page: 1 of 2 Case: 12-10220 2 10/04/2013 ID: 8809519 DktEntry: 35 UNITED STATES V. FLORES-CORDERO 2. At slip op. 8, in the first sentence of the second full paragraph; 723 F.3d at 1088, line 4 of the second full paragraph, delete the word “serious.” With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. The petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. Page: 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?