Microsoft Corporation v. Motorola, Inc, et al

Filing 3

Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: KS): The appeal filed May 2, 2012 is a preliminary injunction appeal. Accordingly, Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3 shall apply. If they have not already done so, within 7 calendar days after the filing date of this order, the parties shall make arrangements to obtain from the court reporter an official transcript of proceedings in the district court that will be included in the record on appeal. The briefing schedule shall proceed as follows: the opening brief and excerpts of record are due not later than May 30, 2012; the answering brief is due June 27, 2012 or 28 days after service of the opening brief, whichever is earlier; and the optional reply brief is due within 14 days after service of the answering brief. See 9th Cir. R. 3-3(b). Failure to file timely the opening brief shall result in the automatic dismissal of this appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [8165788] (WL)

Download PDF
FILED MAY 04 2012 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington corporation, Plaintiff - Appellee, MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS No. 12-35352 D.C. No. 2:10-cv-01823-JLR Western District of Washington, Seattle v. MOTOROLA, INC.; et al., ORDER Defendants - Appellants. The appeal filed May 2, 2012 is a preliminary injunction appeal. Accordingly, Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3 shall apply. If they have not already done so, within 7 calendar days after the filing date of this order, the parties shall make arrangements to obtain from the court reporter an official transcript of proceedings in the district court that will be included in the record on appeal. The briefing schedule shall proceed as follows: the opening brief and excerpts of record are due not later than May 30, 2012; the answering brief is due June 27, 2012 or 28 days after service of the opening brief, whichever is earlier; KS/MOATT and the optional reply brief is due within 14 days after service of the answering brief. See 9th Cir. R. 3-3(b). Failure to file timely the opening brief shall result in the automatic dismissal of this appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. FOR THE COURT: MOLLY C. DWYER CLERK OF COURT By: Kenneth Sogabe Motions Attorney/Deputy Clerk 9th Cir. R. 27-7 General Orders/Appendix A KS/MOATT 2 12-35352

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?