Microsoft Corporation v. Motorola, Inc, et al

Filing 49

Filed (ECF) Appellee Microsoft Corporation Correspondence: Letter correcting errors in listing of counsel in opinion. Date of service: 10/01/2012 [8343172] (CLT)

Download PDF
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP BEIJING LOS ANGELES ONE SOUTH DEARBORN STREET BRUSSELS NEW YORK CHICAGO, IL 60603 CHICAGO PALO ALTO (312) 853 7000 DALLAS SAN FRANCISCO (312) 853 7036 FAX FRANKFURT SHANGHAI GENEVA SINGAPORE HONG KONG SYDNEY HOUSTON TOKYO LONDON WASHINGTON, D.C. ctrela@sidley.com (312) 853 7293 FOUNDED 1866 October 1, 2012 Kathy Blesener Senior Editor West Publishing Company 610 Opperman Drive PO Box 64526 St. Paul, MN 55164-0526 Re: Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola, Inc., No. 12-35352 (9th Cir. Sept. 28, 2012) Dear Ms. Blesener: I write concerning two corrections to the listing of counsel for Appellee Microsoft Corporation in the Ninth Circuit’s September 28, 2012 slip opinion in Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola, Inc., No. 12-35352. First, the law firm for counsel Arthur W. Harrigan, Jr., Christopher Wion, and Shane P. Cramer changed names during the pendency of the appeal to “Calfo Harrigan Leyh & Eakes LLP.” Please replace the former firm name (“Danielson Harrigan Leyh & Tollefson LLP”) with the current name; the firm remains in Seattle, WA. Second, my last name is misspelled as “Treta.” Please replace “Treta” with “Trela.” Very truly yours, s/ Constantine L. Trela, Jr. Constantine L. Trela, Jr. cc: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (via ECF) Sidley Austin LLP is a limited liability partnership practicing in affiliation with other Sidley Austin partnerships. 9th Circuit Case Number(s) 12-35352 NOTE: To secure your input, you should print the filled-in form to PDF (File > Print > PDF Printer/Creator). ********************************************************************************* CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE When All Case Participants are Registered for the Appellate CM/ECF System I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court for the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit by using the appellate CM/ECF system on (date) . Oct 1, 2012 I certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and that service will be accomplished by the appellate CM/ECF system. Signature (use "s/" format) s/ Constantine L. Trela, Jr. ********************************************************************************* CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE When Not All Case Participants are Registered for the Appellate CM/ECF System I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court for the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit by using the appellate CM/ECF system on (date) . Participants in the case who are registered CM/ECF users will be served by the appellate CM/ECF system. I further certify that some of the participants in the case are not registered CM/ECF users. I have mailed the foregoing document by First-Class Mail, postage prepaid, or have dispatched it to a third party commercial carrier for delivery within 3 calendar days to the following non-CM/ECF participants: Signature (use "s/" format)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?