SunEarth, Inc., et al v. Sun Earth Solar Power Co., Ltd, et al

Filing

Filed Order for PUBLICATION (SIDNEY R. THOMAS)Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. [10123244] [13-17622, 15-16096]

Case: 13-17622, 09/14/2016, ID: 10123244, DktEntry: 69, Page 1 of 2

FOR PUBLICATION

FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

SEP 14 2016

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SUNEARTH, INC., a California
corporation; THE SOLARAY
CORPORATION, a Hawaiian
corporation,

No.

D.C. No. 4:11-cv-04991-CW
Northern District of California,
Oakland

ORDER

SUN EARTH SOLAR POWER CO.,
LTD., FKA Ningbo Solar Electric Power
Co., Ltd., a Chinese limited liability
company; NBSOLAR USA INC., a
California corporation,
Defendants-Appellees.

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

13-17622

Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

Case: 13-17622, 09/14/2016, ID: 10123244, DktEntry: 69, Page 2 of 2

No.

SUNEARTH, INC., a California
corporation; THE SOLARAY
CORPORATION, a Hawaiian
corporation,

15-16096

D.C. No. 4:11-cv-04991-CW
Northern District of California,
Oakland

Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
SUN EARTH SOLAR POWER CO.,
LTD., FKA Ningbo Solar Electric Power
Co., Ltd., a Chinese limited liability
company; NBSOLAR USA INC., a
California corporation,
Defendants-Appellees.

THOMAS, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that
this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)
and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition shall not be cited as
precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

2