Daniel Demetris, et al v. Transp. Workers Union of Am.
Filing
Filed Order for PUBLICATION (DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, RONALD M. GOULD and MILAN D. SMITH, JR.) The opinion filed in this case on May 22, 2017, and reported at 857 F.3d 803, is hereby amended. An amended opinion is filed concurrently with this order. With this amendment, the panel has unanimously voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judges Gould and M. Smith have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge O Scannlain has so recommended. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No subsequent petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc may be filed. [10496863] [15-15229, 15-15529]
Case: 15-15229, 07/05/2017, ID: 10496863, DktEntry: 46, Page 1 of 4
FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DANIEL DEMETRIS; WILLIAM
BURKE; DANIEL BURSTEIN;
PATRICK COLLINS; RICHARD
GORGAS; PAUL HERFEL; ROBERT
MARINI; ABDUL MORANI; PAUL
MORRONE; ROBERT PALACEK,
individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,
No.
JUL 5 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
15-15229
D.C. No. 3:13-cv-05566-VC
Northern District of California,
San Francisco
ORDER
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION OF
AMERICA, AFL-CIO,
Defendant-Appellee.
MARK LETBETTER; MIKE
MCDONALD; RICK ARNEGARD;
WILLIAM BELL; WILLIAM BLACK;
LONNIE BRADBURY; JOHN
BREEDEN; ROGER BROWN; SCOTT
BROWN; JOHN BYNUM; MIKE CODY;
JOHN CRAWFORD; BILLIE
CUMMINS; GEORGE DANKER; DON
DRAPER; MICHAEL ELMORE; WADE
FAUST; JERRY FRAZIER; KEVIN
GORREMANS; MARY GORREMANS;
JAMES HAYDEN; BRENDA HIGLEY;
RANDY HOLLAND; JIM BOB
JACKSON; ALAN KEITH; EARL
No.
15-15529
D.C. No. 3:14-cv-04075-VC
Northern District of California,
San Francisco
Case: 15-15229, 07/05/2017, ID: 10496863, DktEntry: 46, Page 2 of 4
KUPPINGER; SOREN LOHMAR;
DEBORAH MCDANIEL; JOHNNY
MCDANIEL; MIKE MCNAMARA;
STEVE NUNN; MIKE REYES; GEORGE
RODRIGUEZ; MIKE SHARP; JERRY
SHUPE; CURTIS SIMER; ROBERT
SOMMERS; RONALD SWAN;
TERRANCE THOMAS; BILL
THORSON; JIM TROSKEY; JAMES
WALL; LARRY WEBER; CHOKUSHIN
URASAKI; STEVE ABSHIER; RALPH
BACON; RONNIE BERTRANG;
TRAICE BRYANT; DAN BURKE;
KEVIN CALMAN; DONALD CAUDLE;
JERRY COLLARD; DOUG
CREEKMORE; HUGH COOPER;
BARBARA DEJEAR; BRYAN
DESHAZO; LIDIO A. DOBRICH;
DAVID ELDER; JOHN ELLER; MIKE
ELLER; NED ELZO; RON ENGLES;
DONALD FARRIS; ROBERT FLYNN;
RANDY FORRESTER; JESSE FOSTER;
STEVE FREGARA; PAUL GOULET;
MARION GREENWALT; PHIL
HALLMAN; MCKAYLA HARPER;
SCOTT HERMANSON; LARRY
HOLMES; ROGER KEMP; DANIEL
KITCHENS; LARRY LAWSON; JACK
LOFGREN; PATRICE MANNS;
EDWARD W. MARRACCINI; FARREN
MAYFIELD; GAIL MAYFIELD; GREG
MCBRIDE; FRANK MEFFORD; KEN
MILLER; DANNY MOORE; GERALD
MURRAY; JAMES POTTEBAUM;
JOHN REED; ABRAHAM REICHMAN;
SHARON RITTER; BEN ROUNDTREE;
GARY RUNYON; MARY RUNYON;
2
Case: 15-15229, 07/05/2017, ID: 10496863, DktEntry: 46, Page 3 of 4
ROGER SCHULTZ; TIM SISNEY;
JOSEPH W. SMITH; RONALD SMITH;
STEVE ULLRICH; SUSAN VIRDELL;
MITCH WALLACE; TERRY WALLS;
KENNETH WARREN; ERIC WHALEY;
RAY WHITE; GLENDA WILKERSON;
MIKE WILLIAMS; DON WOODRICH;
JOHNNY YEARY; SAM YORK;
STEVEN JONES, on behalf of themselves
and all others similarly situtated,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
ROY HAILE,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
LOCAL 514, TRANSPORT WORKERS
UNION OF AMERICA; TRANSPORT
WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California
Vince G. Chhabria, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted December 13, 2016
San Francisco, California
Opinion Filed May 22, 2017
Amended Opinion Filed July 5, 2017
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
3
Case: 15-15229, 07/05/2017, ID: 10496863, DktEntry: 46, Page 4 of 4
The opinion filed in this case on May 22, 2017, and reported at 857 F.3d
803, is hereby amended. An amended opinion is filed concurrently with this order.
With this amendment, the panel has unanimously voted to deny the petition for
rehearing. Judges Gould and M. Smith have voted to deny the petition for
rehearing en banc, and Judge O’Scannlain has so recommended. The full court has
been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no active judge has
requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35.
The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are
DENIED. No subsequent petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc may be
filed.
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?