Aileen Rizo v. Jim Yovino
Filing
Filed Order for PUBLICATION (SIDNEY R. THOMAS) Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in this case shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. [10562999]
Case: 16-15372, 08/29/2017, ID: 10562999, DktEntry: 60, Page 1 of 1
FILED
FOR PUBLICATION
AUG 29 2017
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
AILEEN RIZO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
JIM YOVINO, Fresno County
Superintendent of Schools, Erroneously
Sued Herein as Fresno County Office of
Education,
No.
16-15372
D.C. No. 1:14-cv-00423-MJS
Eastern District of California,
Fresno
ORDER
Defendant-Appellant.
THOMAS, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that
this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)
and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in this case shall not be
cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?