Disney Enterprises, Inc., et al v. VidAngel, Inc.

Filing 93

Filed (ECF) Appellees Disney Enterprises, Inc., Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation and Warner Brothers Entertainment, Inc. bill of costs (Form 10) in the amount of $462.30 USD. Date of service: 09/07/2017 [10573308] [16-56843] (Ehler, Rose) [Entered: 09/07/2017 03:28 PM]

Download PDF
Form 10. Bill of Costs ................................................................................................................................(Rev. 12-1-09) United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit BILL OF COSTS Note: If you wish to file a bill of costs, it MUST be submitted on this form and filed, with the clerk, with proof of service, within 14 days of the date of entry of judgment, and in accordance with 9th Circuit Rule 39-1. A late bill of costs must be accompanied by a motion showing good cause. Please refer to FRAP 39, 28 U.S.C. § 1920, and 9th Circuit Rule 39-1 when preparing your bill of costs. DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL 9th Cir. No. 16-56843 VIDANGEL, INC. v. The Clerk is requested to tax the following costs against: VIDANGEL, INC. Cost Taxable under FRAP 39, 28 U.S.C. § 1920, 9th Cir. R. 39-1 REQUESTED Each Column Must Be Completed No. of Docs. Pages per Doc. Cost per Page* TOTAL COST ALLOWED To Be Completed by the Clerk No. of Docs. Cost per Page* Pages per Doc. TOTAL COST $ 0.1 $ 345.5 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 0.1 $ 116.8 $ $ Reply Brief $ $ $ $ Other** $ $ $ $ TOTAL: $ 462.3 TOTAL: $ Excerpt of Record 5 691 Opening Brief Answering Brief 16 73 * Costs per page may not exceed .10 or actual cost, whichever is less. 9th Circuit Rule 39-1. ** Other: Any other requests must be accompanied by a statement explaining why the item(s) should be taxed pursuant to 9th Circuit Rule 39-1. Additional items without such supporting statements will not be considered. Attorneys' fees cannot be requested on this form. Continue to next page. Form 10. Bill of Costs - Continued I, Kelly M. Klaus , swear under penalty of perjury that the services for which costs are taxed were actually and necessarily performed, and that the requested costs were actually expended as listed. Signature s/ Kelly M. Klaus ("s/" plus attorney's name if submitted electronically) Date Sep 7, 2017 Name of Counsel: Munger Tolles & Olson LLP Attorney for: DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL (To Be Completed by the Clerk) Date Costs are taxed in the amount of $ Clerk of Court By: , Deputy Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC., LUCASFILM LTD. LLC, TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION, AND WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC., Plaintiffs-Appellees, No. 16-56843 STATEMENT OF EXPLANATION IN SUPPORT OF BILL OF COSTS, PURSUANT TO NINTH CIRCUIT RULE 39-1 v. VIDANGEL, INC., Defendant-Appellant. Pursuant to 9th Circuit Rule 39-1.2, Plaintiff-Appellees’ bill of costs includes those incurred for the required copies, plus one additional copy, of each of the Appellee’s SEALED Answering Brief (7 paper copies, plus 1 additional copy) and REDACTED Answering Brief (7 paper copies, plus 1 additional copy). See Docket Entries Nos. 77, 78 (acknowledging receipt of briefs). Plaintiffs-Appellees respectfully request these be taxed against Defendant-Appellant, VidAngel, Inc. Dated: September 7, 2017 Respectfully submitted, s/ Kelly M. Klaus Kelly M. Klaus kelly.klaus@mto.com MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 350 South Grand Ave, Fiftieth Flr. Los Angeles, California 90071-1560 Telephone: (213) 683-9100 Facsimile: (213) 687-3702 36164517.1 CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing Plaintiffs-Appellees’ Bill of Costs with the Clerk of the Court for the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit by using the appellate CM/ECF system on September 7, 2017. I certify that all the participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and that service will be accomplished by the appellate CM/ECF system. DATED: September 7, 2017 s/ Kelly M. Klaus KELLY M. KLAUS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?