Disney Enterprises, Inc., et al v. VidAngel, Inc.
Filing
93
Filed (ECF) Appellees Disney Enterprises, Inc., Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation and Warner Brothers Entertainment, Inc. bill of costs (Form 10) in the amount of $462.30 USD. Date of service: 09/07/2017 [10573308] [16-56843] (Ehler, Rose) [Entered: 09/07/2017 03:28 PM]
Form 10. Bill of Costs ................................................................................................................................(Rev. 12-1-09)
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
BILL OF COSTS
Note:
If you wish to file a bill of costs, it MUST be submitted on this form and filed, with the clerk, with proof of
service, within 14 days of the date of entry of judgment, and in accordance with 9th Circuit Rule 39-1. A
late bill of costs must be accompanied by a motion showing good cause. Please refer to FRAP 39, 28
U.S.C. § 1920, and 9th Circuit Rule 39-1 when preparing your bill of costs.
DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL
9th Cir. No. 16-56843
VIDANGEL, INC.
v.
The Clerk is requested to tax the following costs against: VIDANGEL, INC.
Cost Taxable
under FRAP 39,
28 U.S.C. § 1920,
9th Cir. R. 39-1
REQUESTED
Each Column Must Be Completed
No. of
Docs.
Pages per
Doc.
Cost per
Page*
TOTAL
COST
ALLOWED
To Be Completed by the Clerk
No. of
Docs.
Cost per
Page*
Pages per
Doc.
TOTAL
COST
$ 0.1
$ 345.5
$
$
$
$
$
$
$ 0.1
$ 116.8
$
$
Reply Brief
$
$
$
$
Other**
$
$
$
$
TOTAL:
$ 462.3
TOTAL: $
Excerpt of Record
5
691
Opening Brief
Answering Brief
16
73
* Costs per page may not exceed .10 or actual cost, whichever is less. 9th Circuit Rule 39-1.
** Other: Any other requests must be accompanied by a statement explaining why the item(s) should be taxed
pursuant to 9th Circuit Rule 39-1. Additional items without such supporting statements will not be
considered.
Attorneys' fees cannot be requested on this form.
Continue to next page.
Form 10. Bill of Costs - Continued
I, Kelly M. Klaus
, swear under penalty of perjury that the services for which costs are taxed
were actually and necessarily performed, and that the requested costs were actually expended as listed.
Signature s/ Kelly M. Klaus
("s/" plus attorney's name if submitted electronically)
Date Sep 7, 2017
Name of Counsel: Munger Tolles & Olson LLP
Attorney for: DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL
(To Be Completed by the Clerk)
Date
Costs are taxed in the amount of $
Clerk of Court
By:
, Deputy Clerk
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC.,
LUCASFILM LTD. LLC,
TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM
CORPORATION, AND WARNER
BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC.,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
No. 16-56843
STATEMENT OF EXPLANATION
IN SUPPORT OF BILL OF COSTS,
PURSUANT TO NINTH CIRCUIT
RULE 39-1
v.
VIDANGEL, INC.,
Defendant-Appellant.
Pursuant to 9th Circuit Rule 39-1.2, Plaintiff-Appellees’ bill of costs
includes those incurred for the required copies, plus one additional copy, of each of
the Appellee’s SEALED Answering Brief (7 paper copies, plus 1 additional copy)
and REDACTED Answering Brief (7 paper copies, plus 1 additional copy). See
Docket Entries Nos. 77, 78 (acknowledging receipt of briefs). Plaintiffs-Appellees
respectfully request these be taxed against Defendant-Appellant, VidAngel, Inc.
Dated: September 7, 2017
Respectfully submitted,
s/ Kelly M. Klaus
Kelly M. Klaus
kelly.klaus@mto.com
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
350 South Grand Ave, Fiftieth Flr.
Los Angeles, California 90071-1560
Telephone: (213) 683-9100
Facsimile: (213) 687-3702
36164517.1
CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing Plaintiffs-Appellees’
Bill of Costs with the Clerk of the Court for the United States Court of Appeals for
the Ninth Circuit by using the appellate CM/ECF system on September 7, 2017.
I certify that all the participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and
that service will be accomplished by the appellate CM/ECF system.
DATED:
September 7, 2017
s/ Kelly M. Klaus
KELLY M. KLAUS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?