State of Washington, et al v. Donald J. Trump, et al
Filing
139
Filed order (SIDNEY R. THOMAS): A judge on this Court has made a sua sponte request that a vote be taken as to whether the order issued by the three judge motions panel on February 9, 2017, should be reconsidered en banc. A sua sponte en banc call having been made, the parties are instructed to file simultaneous briefs setting forth their respective positions on whether this matter should be reconsidered en banc. The briefs should be filed on or before 11:00 a.m., Pacific time, on Thursday, February 16. The supplemental briefs shall be filed electronically and consist of no more than 14,000 words. See General Order 5.4(c)(3). [10315878] (HH) [Entered: 02/10/2017 02:52 PM]
FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STATE OF WASHINGTON and STATE
OF MINNESOTA,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
No.
FEB 10 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
17-35105
D.C. No. 2:17-cv-00141
Western District of Washington,
Seattle
v.
DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the
United States; et al.,
ORDER
Defendants-Appellants.
THOMAS, Chief Judge and En Banc Coordinator:
A judge on this Court has made a sua sponte request that a vote be taken as
to whether the order issued by the three judge motions panel on February 9, 2017,
should be reconsidered en banc. A sua sponte en banc call having been made, the
parties are instructed to file simultaneous briefs setting forth their respective
positions on whether this matter should be reconsidered en banc. The briefs should
be filed on or before 11:00 a.m., Pacific time, on Thursday, February 16. The
supplemental briefs shall be filed electronically and consist of no more than 14,000
words. See General Order 5.4(c)(3).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?