State of Washington, et al v. Donald J. Trump, et al
Filing
64
Filed (ECF) joinder letter in lieu of amicus brief pursuant to Circuit Advisory Committee Note to Rule 29-1. Filed by Additional Technology Companies and Other Businesses, joining in brief(s) [19]. Date of service: 02/06/2017. [10304032] [17-35105]--[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to clarify filers. 02/06/2017 by LA] (Pincus, Andrew) [Entered: 02/06/2017 02:26 PM]
Mayer Brown LLP
1999 K Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006-1101
February 6, 2017
BY ELECTRONIC DELIVERY
Molly Dwyer, Clerk of Court
Office of the Clerk
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
P.O. Box 193939
San Francisco, CA 94119-3939
Re:
Main Tel (202) 263-3000
Main Fax (202) 263-3300
www.mayerbrown.com
Andrew J. Pincus
Direct Tel (202) 263-3220
Direct Fax (202) 263- 5220
apincus@mayerbrown.com
Washington v. Trump, No. 17-35105
Dear Ms. Dwyer,
The companies listed below join the proposed Brief of
Technology Companies and Other Businesses as Amici Curiae in
Support of Appellees (Dkt. No. 19-1), filed February 5, 2017 (starting
with number 97, because our filing yesterday inadvertently listed one
amicus twice):
97.
Adobe Systems Incorporated
98.
Affirm, Inc.
99.
Ampush LLC
100. Brocade Communications Systems, Inc.
101. Bungie, Inc.
102. Casper Sleep Inc.
103. Cavium, Inc.
104. Chegg, Inc.
105. ClassPass Inc.
106. Coursera
107. EquityZen Inc.
108. Evernote
109. Gusto
110. Handy Technologies, Inc.
111. HP Inc.
112. IAC/InterActiveCorp
113. Linden Lab
114. Managed By Q Inc.
115. MobileIron
116. New Relic, Inc.
117. Pandora Media, Inc.
118. Planet Labs Inc.
119. RPX Corporation
120. Shift Technologies, Inc.
121. Slack Technologies, Inc.
122. SpaceX
123. Tesla, Inc.
124. TripAdvisor, Inc.
125. Udacity, Inc.
126. Zendesk, Inc.
127. Zenefits
2
Amici provide the corporate disclosures required by Fed. R.
App. P. 26.1 and 29(c) in the attached Exhibit A. A copy of this letter
will be served on all counsel of record.
Sincerely,
/s/ Andrew J. Pincus
cc: counsel of record
3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that on this 6th day of February 2017, I served the
foregoing letter regarding additional amici curiae via the Court’s ECF
system upon all counsel.
Dated: February 6, 2017
/s/ Andrew J. Pincus
Andrew J. Pincus
MAYER BROWN LLP
EXHIBIT A
CORPORATE DISCLOSURES FOR AMICI CURIAE
97.
Adobe Systems Incorporated has no parent corporation
and no publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of
its stock.
98.
Affirm, Inc. has no parent corporation and no publicly
held corporation owns 10% or more of its stock.
99.
Ampush LLC has no parent corporation and no publicly
held corporation owns 10% or more of its stock.
100. Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. has no parent
corporation and no publicly held corporation owns 10%
or more of its stock.
101. Bungie, Inc. has no parent corporation and the following
publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of its stock:
Microsoft Corporation.
102. Casper Sleep Inc. has no parent corporation and no
publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of its stock.
103. Cavium, Inc. has no parent corporation and no publicly
held corporation owns 10% or more of its stock.
104. Chegg, Inc. has no parent corporation and no publicly
held corporation owns 10% or more of its stock.
105. ClassPass Inc. has no parent corporation and no publicly
held corporation owns 10% or more of its stock.
106. Coursera has no parent corporation and no publicly held
corporation owns 10% or more of its stock.
107. EquityZen Inc. has no parent corporation and no publicly
held corporation owns 10% or more of its stock.
108. Evernote Corporation has no parent corporation and no
publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of its stock.
1a
109. ZenPayroll, Inc., dba Gusto has no parent corporation
and no publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of
its stock.
110. Handy Technologies, Inc. has no parent corporation and
no publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of its
stock.
111. HP Inc. has no parent corporation and no publicly held
corporation owns 10% or more of its stock.
112. IAC/InterActiveCorp has no parent corporation and no
publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of its stock.
113. Linden Research, Inc. d/b/a Linden Lab has no parent
corporation and no publicly held corporation owns 10%
or more of its stock.
114. Managed By Q Inc. has no parent corporation and no
publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of its stock.
115. MobileIron, Inc. has no parent corporation and no
publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of its stock.
116. New Relic, Inc. has no parent corporation and the
following publicly held corporation owns 10% or more
of its stock: investment funds affiliated with T Rowe
Price.
117. Pandora Media, Inc. has no parent corporation and no
publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of its stock.
118. Planet Labs Inc. has no parent corporation and no
publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of its stock.
119. RPX Corporation has no parent corporation and no
publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of its stock.
120. Shift Technologies, Inc. (“Shift”) has no parent
corporation and the following publicly held corporation
owns 10% or more of its stock: investment funds
affiliated with Goldman Sachs Group Inc.
2a
121. Slack Technologies, Inc. has no parent corporation and
no publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of its
stock.
122. Space Exploration Technologies Corp. has no parent
corporation and no publicly held corporation owns 10%
or more of its stock
123. Tesla, Inc. has no parent corporation and no publicly held
corporation owns 10% or more of its stock.
124. TripAdvisor, Inc. has no parent corporation and the
following publicly held corporation owns 10% or more
of its stock: Liberty TripAdvisor Holdings, Inc.
125. Udacity, Inc. has no parent corporation and no publicly
held corporation owns 10% or more of its stock.
126. Zendesk, Inc. has no parent corporation and no publicly
held corporation owns 10% or more of its stock.
127. Zenefits has no parent corporation and no publicly held
corporation owns 10% or more of its stock.
3a
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?