State of Washington, et al v. Donald J. Trump, et al

Filing 79

Filed (ECF) Anti-Defamation League Motion to extend time to file amicus brief until 02/06/2017. Date of service: 02/06/2017. [10304213] [17-35105]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached declaration (incorrectly filed in entry [80]), updated docket text to include name of amicus, resent notice. 02/06/2017 by LA] (Barton, Richard) [Entered: 02/06/2017 03:06 PM]

Download PDF
No. 17-35105 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. DONALD TRUMP, President of the United States, et al., Defendant-Appellants. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF OF THE ANTIDEFAMATION LEAGUE IN SUPPORT OF THE PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES RICHARD D. BARTON (Bar No. 102613) SHELLEY A. CARDER (Bar No. 137755) KENDRA J. HALL (Bar No. 166836) Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch, LLP 12544 High Bluff Dr., Ste. JOHN B. HARRIS Counsel for Amicus Curiae ADL Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz, P.C. 488 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10022 (212) 705-4823 jharris@fkks.com STEVEN M. FREEMAN The Anti-Defamation League 605 Third Avenue New York, New York 10158 (212) 885-7700 sfreeman@adl.org 300 San Diego, CA 92130 (619) 515-3299 rick.barton@procopio.com ii MOTION TO EXTEND TIME & DEEM BRIEF TIMELY-FILED The undersigned respectfully moves this Court for a request an extension of time to file the amicus curiae brief concurrently filed and for an order deeming the brief timely filed. This motion is filed pursuant Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 29 and/or 26(a)(3) and/or 26 (b) and/or based upon the Court’s power to grant equitable relief, for good cause shown, and the declaration of Shelley A. Carder (“SAC Declaration”), filed concurrently with this motion. All parties consented to the submission of amici briefs in this case up to midnight on February 5, 2017 and due to scheduled ECF maintenance, the Court extended the filing deadline to 1:00 a.m. PST on February 6, 2017. Due to the technical problems with access to the ECF filing system, as outlined in the SAC Declaration, the ADL amicus curiae brief was not timely filed. In addition, the documents were later rejected as they were not separately-filed and it was missing the motion for leave to file. These problems are corrected with this filing. /// /// /// /// /// /// 1 DOCS 999999-901086/2808386.1 The ADL respectfully requests this Court issue an order extending the time for the ADL to file the amicus curiae brief concurrently-filed with this motion and/or to deem the brief timely-filed. Dated: February 6, 2017 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Shelley A. Carder /s/ John B. Harris /s/ Steven M. Freeman RICHARD D. BARTON (Bar No. 102613) SHELLEY A. CARDER (Bar No. 137755) KENDRA J. HALL (Bar No. 166836) Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch, LLP 12544 High Bluff Dr., Ste.300 San Diego, CA 92130 (619) 515-3299 rick.barton@procopio.com JOHN B. HARRIS Counsel for Amicus Curiae ADL Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz, P.C. 488 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10022 (212) 705-4823 jharris@fkks.com STEVEN M. FREEMAN The Anti-Defamation League 605 Third Avenue New York, New York 10158 (212) 885-7700 sfreeman@adl.org 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on February 6, 2017, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the court for the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit using the appellate CM/ECF system. I certify that I am a registered CM/ECF user and that all parties have registered CM/ECF users and that service will be accomplished by the appellate CM/ECF system. Dated: February 6, 2017 /s/Richard D. Barton RICHARD D. BARTON (Bar No. 102613) SHELLEY A. CARDER (Bar No. 137755) KENDRA J. HALL (Bar No. 166836) Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch, LLP 12544 High Bluff Dr., Ste. 300 San Diego, CA 92130 (619) 515-3299 rick.barton@procopio.com shelley.carder@procopio.com 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?