State of Washington, et al v. Donald J. Trump, et al
Filing
79
Filed (ECF) Anti-Defamation League Motion to extend time to file amicus brief until 02/06/2017. Date of service: 02/06/2017. [10304213] [17-35105]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached declaration (incorrectly filed in entry [80]), updated docket text to include name of amicus, resent notice. 02/06/2017 by LA] (Barton, Richard) [Entered: 02/06/2017 03:06 PM]
No. 17-35105
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellees, v.
DONALD TRUMP, President of the United States, et
al., Defendant-Appellants.
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN
DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF OF THE ANTIDEFAMATION LEAGUE IN SUPPORT OF THE
PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES
RICHARD D. BARTON
(Bar No. 102613)
SHELLEY A. CARDER
(Bar No. 137755)
KENDRA J. HALL
(Bar No. 166836)
Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves
& Savitch, LLP
12544 High Bluff Dr., Ste.
JOHN B. HARRIS
Counsel for Amicus Curiae
ADL
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein &
Selz, P.C.
488 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10022
(212) 705-4823
jharris@fkks.com
STEVEN M. FREEMAN
The Anti-Defamation
League
605 Third Avenue
New York, New York
10158
(212) 885-7700
sfreeman@adl.org
300
San Diego, CA 92130
(619) 515-3299
rick.barton@procopio.com
ii
MOTION TO EXTEND TIME & DEEM BRIEF TIMELY-FILED
The undersigned respectfully moves this Court for a request an extension of
time to file the amicus curiae brief concurrently filed and for an order deeming the
brief timely filed.
This motion is filed pursuant Federal Rules of Appellate
Procedure 29 and/or 26(a)(3) and/or 26 (b) and/or based upon the Court’s power to
grant equitable relief, for good cause shown, and the declaration of Shelley A.
Carder (“SAC Declaration”), filed concurrently with this motion.
All parties consented to the submission of amici briefs in this case up to
midnight on February 5, 2017 and due to scheduled ECF maintenance, the Court
extended the filing deadline to 1:00 a.m. PST on February 6, 2017. Due to the
technical problems with access to the ECF filing system, as outlined in the SAC
Declaration, the ADL amicus curiae brief was not timely filed. In addition, the
documents were later rejected as they were not separately-filed and it was missing
the motion for leave to file. These problems are corrected with this filing.
///
///
///
///
///
///
1
DOCS 999999-901086/2808386.1
The ADL respectfully requests this Court issue an order extending the time
for the ADL to file the amicus curiae brief concurrently-filed with this motion
and/or to deem the brief timely-filed.
Dated: February 6, 2017
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Shelley A. Carder
/s/ John B. Harris
/s/ Steven M. Freeman
RICHARD D. BARTON
(Bar No. 102613)
SHELLEY A. CARDER
(Bar No. 137755)
KENDRA J. HALL
(Bar No. 166836)
Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves
& Savitch, LLP
12544 High Bluff Dr.,
Ste.300
San Diego, CA 92130
(619) 515-3299
rick.barton@procopio.com
JOHN B. HARRIS
Counsel for Amicus Curiae
ADL
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein &
Selz, P.C.
488 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10022
(212) 705-4823
jharris@fkks.com
STEVEN M. FREEMAN
The Anti-Defamation
League
605 Third Avenue
New York, New York
10158
(212) 885-7700
sfreeman@adl.org
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on February 6, 2017, I electronically filed the foregoing
with the Clerk of the court for the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth
Circuit using the appellate CM/ECF system.
I certify that I am a registered CM/ECF user and that all parties have
registered CM/ECF users and that service will be accomplished by the appellate
CM/ECF system.
Dated: February 6, 2017
/s/Richard D. Barton
RICHARD D. BARTON (Bar No. 102613)
SHELLEY A. CARDER (Bar No. 137755)
KENDRA J. HALL (Bar No. 166836)
Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch, LLP
12544 High Bluff Dr., Ste. 300
San Diego, CA 92130
(619) 515-3299
rick.barton@procopio.com
shelley.carder@procopio.com
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?