Paul Bame, et al v. Todd Dillard, et al

Filing

OPINION filed [1299941] (Pages: 14) for the Court by Judge Ginsburg, DISSENTING OPINION (Pages: 23) by Judge Rogers [09-5330]

Case: 09-5330

Document: 1299941

Filed: 03/25/2011

Page: 1

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No. 09-5330

September Term, 2010
FILED ON : MARCH 29, 2011

PAUL BAME , ET AL.,
APPELLEES
v.
TODD W. DILLARD , IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPICITY (FORMER UNITED STATES MARSHAL FOR THE
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ),
APPELLANT

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Columbia
(No. 1:05-cv-01833)

Before: GINSBURG and ROGERS, Circuit Judges, and WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge
ORDER
It is ORDERED, on the court’s own motion, that the dissenting opinion issued on March
25, 2011, be amended as follows:
On page 4, first full paragraph, delete lines 9-14 beginning with the citation “Pearson v.
Callahan and ending at 823.”, and insert in lieu thereof:
“Pearson v. Callahan, 129 S. Ct. 808 (2009). There the Supreme Court concluded that
the narcotics task force officers were entitled to rely on the consensus among the courts to the
consent-once-removed doctrine at the time of their warrantless entry into a home, despite the lack
of a ruling from the officers’ own federal circuit, id. at 823.”
Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT:
Mark J. Langer, Clerk
BY:

/s/
Jennifer M. Clark
Deputy Clerk