Morris Davis v. James Billington, et al

Filing 15

JOINT MOTION filed [1317211] by Daniel P. Mulhollan and Morris D. Davis to extend time to file brief to 08/01/2011. (Response to Motion served by mail due on 07/21/2011) [Service Date: 07/07/2011 by CM/ECF NDA] Pages: 1-10. [11-5092] (Fine, Aden) [Entered: 07/07/2011 01:37 PM]

Download PDF
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT MORRIS D. DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 11-5092 JAMES H. BILLINGTON, in his official capacity as the Librarian of Congress, Defendant, DANIEL P. MULHOLLAN, in his individual capacity, Defendant-Appellant. JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 26(b) and D.C. Circuit Rule 28(e), the parties jointly request an eleven-day extension of the deadlines set forth in the existing briefing schedule. Specifically, the parties request that the briefing schedule be amended as follows: (1) Defendant-Appellant’s Brief would be due no later than August 1, 2011; (2) Plaintiff-Appellee’s Brief would be due no later than September 2, 2011; and (3) Defendant-Appellant’s Reply Brief would be due 1 no later than September 16, 2011. In support of the request, the parties state as follows: 1. On June 8, 2011, this Court entered an order setting a briefing schedule. Under that schedule, Defendant-Appellant’s opening brief is due on July 21, 2011, Plaintiff-Appellee’s response brief is due on August 22, 2011, and Defendant-Appellant’s reply brief is due on September 6, 2011. 2. No party has previously requested an extension of time in this matter. 3. An eleven-day extension of the briefing schedule is necessary because of other work commitments and scheduled summer vacation plans of the parties’ respective counsel. Specifically, Defendant-Appellant’s counsel has another brief due in this Court on July 22, 2011, in Al Kandari v. United States, No. 10-5373 (D.C. Cir.), and local counsel and lead counsel for Plaintiff-Appellant have summer vacations scheduled for August 9-22 and August 21-28, respectively. 5. Granting this extension will not cause any prejudice to any party in this matter. 6. There will be no inconvenience to the Court, as no date for oral argument has yet been set. WHEREFORE, with good cause shown, the parties respectfully request that this Court enter an Order extending the briefing schedule by eleven days, such that Defendant-Appellant’s Brief would be due no later than August 1, 2011, Plaintiff- 2 Appellee’s Brief would be due no later than September 2, 2011, and DefendantAppellant’s Reply Brief would be due no later than September 16, 2011. Respectfully submitted, Dated: July 7, 2011 /s/ Aden J. Fine_____________ ___ Aden J. Fine American Civil Liberties Union Foundation 125 Broad St., 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 Phone: (212) 549-2693 Fax: (212) 549-2652 afine@aclu.org Arthur B. Spitzer Frederick V. Mulhauser American Civil Liberties Union of the Nation’s Capital 1400 20th Street, N.W., Suite 119 Washington, D.C. 20036 Phone: (202) 457-0800 Fax: (202) 452-1868 artspitzer@aol.com fmulhauser@aol.com ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFAPPELLEE MORRIS D. DAVIS THOMAS M. BONDY (202) 514-4825 /s/ Sharon Swingle SHARON SWINGLE (202) 353-2689 Attorneys, Appellate Staff Civil Division, Room 7250 3 Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTAPPELLANT DANIEL P. MULHOLLAN 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 7th day of July, 2011, the foregoing Joint Motion to Extend Briefing Schedule was filed electronically through the CM/ECF system, which caused the following parties or counsel to be served by electronic means: Thomas M. Bondy Sharon Swingle (202) 514-4825 (202) 353-2689 Attorneys, Appellate Staff Civil Division, Room 7250 Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 /s/ Aden J. Fine_______ Aden J. Fine American Civil Liberties Union Foundation 125 Broad St., 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 Phone: (212) 549-2693 Fax: (212) 549-2652 afine@aclu.org

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?