Rhodes v. Houston County Commissioners et al (INMATE1)

Filing 33

ORDER directing as follows: (1) defs' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED to the extent the defendants seek dismissal of this case due to the plf's failure to properly exhaust an administrative remedy previously available to him in the H ouston County Jail; (2) this case is DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 42 USC 1997e(a) for the plf's failure to exhaust an administrative remedy available to him during his confinement in the Houston County Jail. Signed by Honorable W. Harold Albritton, III on 3/10/09. (djy, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION GEORGE HENRY RHODES, JR., Plaintiff, vs. HOUSTON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06cv305-WHA (WO) ORDER This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #32), filed on February 4, 2009, to which no timely objection has been filed. Upon consideration, the Recommendation is adopted, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED to the extent the Defendants seek dismissal of this case due to the Plaintiff's failure to properly exhaust an administrative remedy previously available to him in the Houston County Jail. 2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 42 U.S.C. 1997e(a) for the Plaintiff's failure to exhaust an administrative remedy available to him during his confinement in the Houston County Jail. DONE this 10th day March, 2009. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?