Nails v. City of Dothan

Filing 7

ORDERED that: (1) the 6 objection filed by the plaintiff on 9/11/06 is overruled; (2) the 5 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted in part and rejected in part; (3) the 5 Recommendation is REJECTED to the extent that this action should be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B), but ADOPTED in all other respects; (4) this action is dismissed WITHOUT prejudice pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B). Signed by Judge William Keith Watkins on 9/11/06. (sl, )

Download PDF
Nails v. City of Dothan Doc. 7 Case 1:06-cv-00760-WKW-DRB Document 7 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA S O U T H E R N DIVISION A N G E L A DENISE NAILS, P l a in tif f , v. CITY OF DOTHAN, D e f e n d a n t. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER A f te r an independent and de novo review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT a n d DECREE of the Court: (1 ) That the objection filed by the plaintiff on September 11, 2006 (Doc. # 6) is O V ER RU LED ; (2 ) T h a t the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge entered on S e p tem b e r 6, 2006 (Doc. # 5) is ADOPTED in part and REJECTED in part; (3 ) T h e recommendation is REJECTED to the extent that this action should be D IS M IS S E D WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B), but A D O P T E D in all other respects; (4) This action is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U .S .C . 1915(e)(2)(B). D O N E this 11th day of September, 2006. C A S E NO.: 1:06-cv-760-WKW (WO) /s/ W. Keith Watkins UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?