Nails v. City of Dothan

Filing 7

ORDERED that: (1) the 6 objection filed by the plaintiff on 9/11/06 is overruled; (2) the 5 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted in part and rejected in part; (3) the 5 Recommendation is REJECTED to the extent that this action should be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B), but ADOPTED in all other respects; (4) this action is dismissed WITHOUT prejudice pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B). Signed by Judge William Keith Watkins on 9/11/06. (sl, )

Nails v. City of Dothan

Doc. 7

Case 1:06-cv-00760-WKW-DRB

Document 7

Filed 09/11/2006

Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA S O U T H E R N DIVISION A N G E L A DENISE NAILS, P l a in tif f , v. CITY OF DOTHAN, D e f e n d a n t. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER A f te r an independent and de novo review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT a n d DECREE of the Court: (1 ) That the objection filed by the plaintiff on September 11, 2006 (Doc. # 6) is O V ER RU LED ; (2 ) T h a t the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge entered on S e p tem b e r 6, 2006 (Doc. # 5) is ADOPTED in part and REJECTED in part; (3 ) T h e recommendation is REJECTED to the extent that this action should be D IS M IS S E D WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), but A D O P T E D in all other respects; (4) This action is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U .S .C . § 1915(e)(2)(B). D O N E this 11th day of September, 2006.

C A S E NO.: 1:06-cv-760-WKW (WO)

/s/ W. Keith Watkins UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dockets.Justia.com