Nails v. Houston County Circuit Clerk Office

Filing 4

JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the Court: (1) that plf Nails's 2 motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees is granted to the extent that her complaint shall be filed without the prepayment of fees; (2) that plf Nails's complaint is dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii); further ORDERING that costs are taxed against plf Nails, for which execution may issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Judge Myron H. Thompson on 10/26/07. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

Download PDF
Nails v. Houston County Circuit Clerk Office Doc. 4 Case 1:07-cv-00959-MHT-SRW Document 4 Filed 10/26/2007 Page 1 of 2 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION ANGELA DENISE NAILS, Plaintiff, v. HOUSTON COUNTY CIRCUIT CLERK OFFICE, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. ) 1:07cv959-MHT ) (WO) ) ) ) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court: (1) That plaintiff Angela Denise Nails's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2) is granted to the extent that her complaint shall be filed without the prepayment of fees; and (2) That plaintiff Nails's complaint is dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii). Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:07-cv-00959-MHT-SRW Document 4 Filed 10/26/2007 Page 2 of 2 It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff Nails, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 26th day of October, 2007. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?