Byrd v. Forniss et al (INMATE3)
ORDERED as follows: (1) The 22 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; (2) The 1 Petition for Habeas Corpus relief is DENIED; and (3) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable William Keith Watkins on 12/8/2009. (cb, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR T H E MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA S O U T H E R N DIVISION C U R T BYRD, # 131190, P la in tif f , v. L E O N FORNISS, et al., D e f e n d a n ts. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER O n November 22, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case (Doc. # 22), to which no objections were filed. Upon independent review of the record, and u p o n consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED as follows: (1 ) (2) (3 ) T h e Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 22) is ADOPTED; M r. Byrd's Petition for Habeas Corpus Relief (Doc. # 1) is DENIED; and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
C A S E NO. 1:07-CV-1026-WKW
D O N E this 8th day of December, 2009. /s/ W. Keith Watkins UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?