Mathis v. Hughes et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 48

ORDERED that: (1) The 44 Objection to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is overruled; (2) The 44 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; (3) The defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice; and (4) The costs of this proceeding are taxed against the plaintiff. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 9/20/2010. (cb, )

Mathis v. Hughes et al (INMATE 1)

Doc. 48

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA S O U T H E R N DIVISION R A Y M O N D MATHIS, #140252, P la in tif f , v. A N D Y HUGHES, et al., D e f e n d a n ts. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

C A S E NO. 1:08-cv-0277-MEF WO

ORDER
A f te r an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE o f the court that: 1 . The plaintiff's objection (Doc. #44) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate J u d g e filed on September 16, 2010 is overruled; 2 . The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #44) entered on August 10, 2 0 1 0 is adopted; 3 . The defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and this case is D IS M IS S E D with prejudice. 4 . The costs of this proceeding are taxed against the plaintiff. D O N E this the 20th day of September, 2010.

/s/ Mark E. Fuller CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dockets.Justia.com