Mathis v. Hughes et al (INMATE1)

Filing 31

OPINION; that (1) the defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted; (2) judgment be granted in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff; and (3) the costs of this proceeding be taxed against the plaintiff. After a review of the re commendation, to which the plaintiff did not object, and after an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the court believes that the recommendation should be adopted. An appropriate judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 9/20/2010. (jg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION RAYMOND MATHIS, #140252, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF ANDY R. HUGHES, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:08-CV-412-MHT [WO] ) OPINION This litigation is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that (1) the defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted; (2) judgment be granted in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff; and (3) the costs of this proceeding be taxed against the plaintiff. After a review of the recommendation, to which the plaintiff did not object, and after an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the court believes that the recommendation should be adopted. judgment will be entered. DONE, this the 20th day of September, 2010. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE An appropriate

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?