Mathis v. Hughes et al (INMATE1)
ORDERED that: (1) The 22 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; and (2) This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with the orders of this court and to properly prosecute this action. An appropriate judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable W. Harold Albritton, III on 9/8/2009. (cb, )
THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA S O U T H E R N DIVISION R A Y M O N D MATHIS, #140252 Plaintiff, v. ) ) ) ) )C IV IL ACTION 1:08-CV-606-WHA ) [W O ] ) ) ) )
S H E R IF F ANDY HUGHES, et al., Defendants.
O n August 17, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. 22) in this c a se to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is O R D E R E D that: 1. 2. T h e Recommendation (Doc. 22) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; T h is case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply w ith the orders of this court and to properly prosecute this action. A n appropriate judgment will be entered. D o n e this 8th day of September, 2009.
/s/ W. Harold Albritton SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?