Hooks v. Houston County Jail et al (INMATE2)

Filing 23

ORDERED granting 22 Motion to Amend Complaint is granted in part and denied in part. To the extent Plaintiff seeks to named "Medical Department" as a defendant the motion is DENIED. To the extent Plaintiff seeks to amend relief sought in the complaint, it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. Signed by Honorable Wallace Capel, Jr on 11/17/2008. (cb, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION ____________________________ EMMANUEL QUITEN HOOKS Plaintiff, v. CORRECTION OFFICER DYKES, et al., Defendants. ____________________________ * * * * * 1:08-CV-776-TMH (WO) ORDER ON MOTION Upon consideration of Plaintiff's motion to amend complaint, and for good cause, the court concludes that the motion is due to be granted in part and denied in part. To the extent Plaintiff seeks to named "Medical Department" as a defendant it is ORDERED that the motion (Doc. No. 22) be and is hereby DENIED. See Dean v. Barber, 951 F.2d 1210, 1214 (11th Cir. 1992). To the extent Plaintiff seeks to amend the relief sought in the complaint, it is ORDERED that the motion (Doc. No. 22) be and is hereby GRANTED. Done, this 17th day of November 2008. /s/ Wallace Capel, Jr. WALLACE CAPEL, JR. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?