Ballard v. The Sherwin-Williams Company et al
ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1) The 105 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2) This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of prosecution; 3) The 103 Motion to Dismiss contained in dfts' Motion to Require Plf to Show Cause Why His Claims Should Not Be Dismissed is GRANTED; 4) Any remaining outstanding motions are DENIED as moot. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 3/19/2009. (wcl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA OF S O U T H E R N DIVISION J IM M Y BALLARD, P l a in tif f , v. T H E SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO., et al., D e f e n d a n ts . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
C A S E NO. 1:08-cv-0824-MEF
O n February 27, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #105) in th is case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the f ile in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the O R D E R , JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1 . The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2 . This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of prosecution. 3 . The Motion to Dismiss contained in defendants' Motion to Require Plaintiff to S h o w Cause Why His Claims Should Not Be Dismissed (Doc. #103) is GRANTED. 4. Any remaining outstanding motions are DENIED as moot. D O N E this the 19th day of March, 2009.
/s/ Mark E. Fuller CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?