Berry v. Houston County et al (INMATE1)
ORDER adopting the 24 Recommendation; granting the 19 Motion for Summary Judgment to the extent defendants seek dismissal of this case due to the plaintiff's failure to properly exhaust an administrative remedy previously available to him at the Houston County Jail; dismissing the case with prejudice as further set out. Signed by Honorable W. Harold Albritton, III on 5/5/2011. (br, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
CLEVELAND BERRY, #217872,
HOUSTON COUNTY, et al.,
CASE NO. 1:09-cv-88-WHA
The Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. #24) in this case to which no
timely objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after an
independent review of the entire record, the Court finds that the Recommendation should be
adopted. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED as follows:
The defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED to the extent
defendants seek dismissal of this case due to the plaintiff’s failure to properly
exhaust an administrative remedy previously available to him at the Houston
County Jail; and
this case is DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of
42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) due to the plaintiff’s failure to properly exhaust an
administrative remedy provided to him during his confinement in the Houston
County Jail as such remedy is no longer available to him with respect to the
claims presenting in this cause of action.
A separate judgment shall issue.
DONE this 5th day May, 2011.
/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?