Bell Aerospace Services, Inc. v. U.S. Aero Services, Inc. et al
ORDER that plaintiff's 140 Objection is is overruled; that 139 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, to which defendants do not object, is adopted; that plaintiff's 120 MOTION for Default Judgment is denied; that plaintiff is permitted to present argument to the jury regarding the "lost evidence." Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 3/5/2010. (cc, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION BELL AEROSPACE SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, v. U.S. AERO SERVICES, INC., STEVE MATHERLY, HARTWELL "WILLY" WILSON, JOE BEN THOMAS, MIKE HALL, RILDA BLAHA, SEAN TAYLOR, TIMBERLY "MIMI" MOORE, RON DONAHUE, and MARK ROBISON, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER After an independent and de novo review of the record in this case, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The overruled. (2) The magistrate judge's recommendation (doc. no. 139), to which defendants do not object, is adopted. plaintiff's objection (doc. no. 140) is
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09cv141-MHT (WO)
(3) Plaintiff's motion for default judgment (doc. no. 120) is denied. (4) Plaintiff is permitted to present argument to the jury regarding the "lost evidence." DONE, this the 5th day of March, 2010.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?