Nails v. National Platinum Card Services

Filing 8

FINAL JUDGMENT, upon consideration of the prior proceedings, opinions and orders entered in this case, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of this Court that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for plfs failure to pay the filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. 1914.1; directing the Clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 5/8/09. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA S O U T H E R N DIVISION A N G E L A DENISE NAILS, P la in tif f , v. N A T IO N A L PLATINUM CARD S E R V IC E S , D e f e n d a n t. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C IV IL ACTION NO. 1:09CV208-MEF (W O ) F I N A L JUDGMENT U p o n consideration of the prior proceedings, opinions and orders entered in this case, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of this Court that this action is DISMISSED w ith o u t prejudice for plaintiff's failure to pay the filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. 1914.1 T h e Clerk of the Court is directed to enter this document on the civil docket as a final ju d g m e n t pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. D O N E this the 8th day of May, 2009. /s/ Mark E. Fuller CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE By order entered on March 17, 2009, the Magistrate Judge directed plaintiff to file certain documents for the court's consideration in evaluating plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff failed to do so and, accordingly, on April 2, 2009, the Magistrate Judge denied the motion and allowed plaintiff until May 4, 2009 to pay the requisite filing fee. The order advised plaintiff that this action may be dismissed if she failed to do so within the time allowed by the court. Plaintiff has neither paid the filing fee nor requested additional time to do so. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?