Ralston v. Bell Aerospace Services, Inc.

Filing 37

ORDER granting 32 Motion for Reconsideration; Plaintiff Ralston's response to defendant Bell Aerospace's 26 motion for summary judgment is now due on April 9, 2010, and defendant Bell Aerospace's reply brief is due on April 23, 2010. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 3/17/2010. (br, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION KIM RALSTON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) U.S. HELICOPTER a/k/a ) Helicopter Support Company, ) and BELL AEROSPACE ) SERVICES, INC., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER This matter is before the court on the plaintiff Kim Ralston's motion for reconsideration following the denial of her motion for extension of time to respond to

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09cv379-MHT (WO)

defendant Bell Aerospace's motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(f). Ralston has met the

requirements under Rule 56(f) for an extension of time to allow for additional depositions. *** Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:

(1) Plaintiff Kim Ralston's motion for motion for reconsideration (Doc. No. 32) is granted. (2) Plaintiff Ralston's response to defendant Bell Aerospace's motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 26) is now due on April 9, 2010, and

defendant Bell Aerospace's reply brief is due on April 23, 2010. DONE, this the 17th day of March, 2010. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE