Yeomans v. Forster and Howell, Incorporated et al

Filing 35

ORDER directing as follows: (1) the 33 MOTION to renew motion to stay proceedings pending outcome of criminal case is GRANTED to the extent that this case is STAYED until 11/30/2009; (2) the plf shall file an answer to the counterclaim no later than 11/30/09. Signed by Honorable W. Harold Albritton, III on 9/22/09. (djy, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION CYNTHIA YEOMANS, Plaintiff, v. FORSTER AND HOWELL, INC., etc., al, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 1:09cv488-WHA ) (wo) ) ) ) ORDER This cause is before the court on the Plaintiff's Motion to Renew Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Outcome of Criminal Case (Doc. #33). This court previously denied a Motion to Stay filed by the Plaintiff on the ground that it was premature. The Plaintiff now seeks to renew her motion, stating that the court's September 23, 2009 deadline to answer the counterclaim filed by the Defendant will force her to invoke her Fifth Amendment rights, or subject her to the possibility of entry of default on the counterclaim. Having been advised at the hearing on the original motion to stay that the Plaintiff's criminal case has been set for a date in November, 2009, and balancing the rights of the parties, the court is willing to grant a limited stay only until the end of November, 2009. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The Motion to Renew Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Outcome of Criminal Case is GRANTED to the extent that this case is STAYED until November 30, 2009. 2. The Plaintiff shall file an Answer to the counterclaim no later than November 30, 2009. Done this 22nd day of September, 2009. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?