Peterson v. Hughes et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 50

ORDER as follows: (1) the 49 Recommendation is ADOPTED; (2) the motion for summary judgment (Doc. 21 ) is GRANTED; (3) Plaintiffs federal claims are DISMISSED with prejudice; and (4) Plaintiffs state-law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. A separate judgment will follow. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 8/12/2013. (dmn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION RANDY PETERSON, #268515, ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:10-CV-102-WKW ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. ANDY HUGHES, et al., Defendants. ORDER There being no objections filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 49), and upon an independent review of the file in this case, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) the Recommendation is ADOPTED; (2) the motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 21) is GRANTED; (3) Plaintiffs’ federal claims are DISMISSED with prejudice; and (4) Plaintiffs state-law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. A separate judgment will follow. DONE this 12th day of August, 2013. /s/ W. Keith Watkins CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?