Blount v. Mitchem et al(INMATE 1)

Filing 17

ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1) The 16 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2) The petition for habeas corpus relief is DENIED and this case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 USC § 2244(d); 3) Costs of this proceeding are taxed against the petitioner. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 3/1/2013. (wcl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION BRYAN ALEXANDER BLOUNT, Petitioner, v. BILLY MITCHEM, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:10-cv-0224-MEF ORDER On January 29, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #16) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. The petition for habeas corpus relief is DENIED and this case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2244(d). 3. Costs of this proceeding are taxed against the petitioner. DONE this the 1st day of March, 2013. /s/ Mark E. Fuller UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?