Cabrera-Geronimo v. United States of America (INMATE 3)

Filing 13

ORDERED as follows: Pursuant to CJA 20, Thomas Brantley, a CJA panel attorney, is hereby appointed to represent the petitioner at an evidentiary hearing, as further set out; Pretrial Telephone Conference set for 8/15/2012, at 09:30 AM, before Honorab le Judge Susan Russ Walker; Counsel for the United States shall make the necessary arrangements to set up the conference call; Evidentiary Hearing set for 8/23/2012, at 10:00 AM, in Courtroom 5B, before Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker; The petition er shall be brought to this district not less than a week in advance of the scheduled evidentiary hearing, as further set out; DIRECTING the Clerk to make arrangements for the assistance of a Spanish Language court interpreter at the 8/23/2012, evide ntiary hearing; Counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the United States shall exchange, and file with the court, lists of witnesses and exhibits not later than 8/20/2012, as further set out; DIRECTING the Clerk to serve this order upon counsel for the petitioner and to make the case file available as reasonably requested. Signed by Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker on 7/18/2012. (furn: Calendar, jt, BOP, USMS, Interpreter Group) (wcl, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION ANTIOCO CABRERA-GERONIMO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 1:10cv674-MHT (WO) ORDER After review of the pleadings and record in this case, the court has determined that, pursuant to Rule 8, Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings for the United States District Court, an evidentiary hearing is required for resolution of the petitioner’s claim that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to file a direct appeal on his behalf after he requested that counsel do so. The court finds that the petitioner, who is currently incarcerated, is eligible for the appointment of counsel under the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Pursuant to CJA 20, Thomas Brantley, a CJA panel attorney, is hereby appointed to represent the petitioner at an evidentiary hearing regarding the issue specified above. 2. Pursuant to this appointment and limited purpose, counsel shall proceed to confer with the petitioner and otherwise make an appropriate investigation concerning this issue. 3. A pretrial telephone conference with counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the United States is scheduled for August 15, 2012, at 9:30 a.m. Counsel for the United States shall make the necessary arrangements to set up the conference call. 4. An evidentiary hearing is scheduled for August 23, 2012, at 10:00 a.m, in courtroom 5-B, Frank M. Johnson, Jr. United States Courthouse Complex, One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama. 5. The petitioner shall be brought to this district not less than a week in advance of the scheduled evidentiary hearing in order to facilitate communications with appointed counsel in preparation for the hearing. 6. The Clerk is DIRECTED to make arrangements for the assistance of a Spanish Language court interpreter at the August 23, 2012, evidentiary hearing. 7. Counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the United States shall exchange, and file with the court, lists of witnesses and exhibits not later than August 20, 2012. All exhibits shall be 2 pre-marked using the same numbers indicated on the exhibit lists, and each party shall deliver to the courtroom deputy prior to commencement of the hearing the original, pre-marked exhibits along with a copy of the exhibits for use by the court. 8. The Clerk is DIRECTED to serve this order upon counsel for the petitioner and to make the case file available as reasonably requested. DONE, this 18th day of July, 2012. /s/ Susan Russ Walker SUSAN RUSS WALKER CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?