Collins v. Selva et al (INMATE2)

Filing 22

ORDER overruling the 14 17 Objections; adopting the 10 15 RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge; dismissing the complaint pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) because the complaint was not filed within the time prescribed by the applicable period of limitations; dismissing the case with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 4/25/2011. (br, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION FRED K. COLLINS, #266 825, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER JASON SELVA, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:10-CV-1069-ID (WO) ORDER Before the court are the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, (Doc. #10), the supplemental recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, (Doc. #15), and the Plaintiff’s objections, (Docs. #14 and #17), to those recommendations. Having conducted a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendations to which objections are made, it is CONSIDERED and ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s objections (Docs. #14 and #17) be and the same are hereby OVERRULED; 2. The recommendations of the Magistrate Judge (Docs. #10 and #15) be and the same are hereby ADOPTED, APPROVED and AFFIRMED; 3. The Plaintiff’s complaint challenging matters arising from his May 2007 vehicle stop, arrest, and imprisonment be and the same are hereby DISMISSED pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) 1 because the complaint was not filed within the time prescribed by the applicable period of limitations; and 4. This case be and the same is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). DONE this the 25th day of April, 2011. /s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?