Thomas v. Albright et al (INMATE3)

Filing 14

ORDER: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1. The 13 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. The 1 Petition for habeas corpus relief is denied as it was not filed within the one-year period of limitation of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(A) and this case is DISMISSED withprejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 11/27/2012. (dmn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
TERREKO DEMESE THOMAS, #220470, )
)
Petitioner,
)
v.
)
)
FRANK ALBRIGHT, et al.,
)
)
Respondents.
)

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-1101-MEF

ORDER
On October 24, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #13) in this
case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file
in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the
ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that:
1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.
2. The petition for habeas corpus relief is denied as it was not filed within the oneyear period of limitation of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(A) and this case is DISMISSED with
prejudice.
DONE this the 27th day of November, 2012.
/s/ Mark E. Fuller
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE