Pouncey v. City of Dothan et al (INMATE 2)
ORDER directing that, after a review of the 4 Recommendation, and after an independent review of the entire record, the Court believes that the Recommendation should be adopted; it is ORDERED as follows: (a) the Recommendation of the Magistrate Jud ge is ADOPTED; (b) the § 1983 claims presented against Defendants City of Dothan and Judge Gordon are DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (iii); (c) Plaintiff's § 1983 cla ims against Defendant Edwards are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); (d) Plaintiff's challenge to the constitutionality of his current detention is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the provisions o f 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) as such claim is not properly before the court at this time; and (e) this case is DISMISSED prior to service of process in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii); a separate judgment shall issue. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 2/9/11. (scn, )
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?